when malignaggi beats khan will he get the credit he deserves?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Relentless, Feb 24, 2010.


  1. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    lets see you take a beating from miguel cotto and stay upright, keyboard ***.
     
  2. avidlemon

    avidlemon Boxing Addict banned

    6,832
    0
    Feb 3, 2009
    oh bite a **** mate. Just giving my opinion. :bbb
     
  3. kgs83

    kgs83 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,868
    0
    Jan 14, 2008
    You should really say IF not WHEN. It makes you look like a plum.

    But IF PM beats Khan he should get credit as Khan is a good boxer.
     
  4. avidlemon

    avidlemon Boxing Addict banned

    6,832
    0
    Feb 3, 2009
    probably one of the more sensible quotes i have seen. As long as khan has a suspect chin, there will always be doubt, but on pure skill, khan wins hadns down. i would even go as far to say that khan wins tko 6-8
     
  5. Zavy

    Zavy A fan among experts Full Member

    4,171
    1
    May 14, 2008
    What if Paulie Ko's him? hahaha...****
     
  6. avidlemon

    avidlemon Boxing Addict banned

    6,832
    0
    Feb 3, 2009
    i will put my neck on the line here and now and say this WILL NOT happen :deal
     
  7. Zavy

    Zavy A fan among experts Full Member

    4,171
    1
    May 14, 2008
    That's why I said, "what if". I don't think it is gonna happen, but could you imagine how crazy the board would go:rofl
     
  8. avidlemon

    avidlemon Boxing Addict banned

    6,832
    0
    Feb 3, 2009
    every one would jizz in their pants, and call for him to take on pacman or something like that
     
  9. d-mo

    d-mo Member Full Member

    238
    0
    May 14, 2009
    You balk at the idea that Paulie can KO Khan and then come back saying Khan will TKO Paulie??? Bold.
     
  10. avidlemon

    avidlemon Boxing Addict banned

    6,832
    0
    Feb 3, 2009
    paulie has done nothing in his career to suggest that he will be able to rely on any kind of power in his fists, whereas khan does have some power.
    I think it is far more realistic to suggest that khan qwould tko paulie, rather than paulie pull something out of the hat and knock khan out
     
  11. finalfight

    finalfight Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,706
    1
    Dec 5, 2008
    That makes no sense. What you appear to be saying is if Paulie negates Khan's speed, breaks his defence and then puts him out that he is somehow a lesser fighter then if he simply does two of the three?

    I hope Paulie does put him down and out but not before Khan bounces around the canvas like a deflating baloon.
     
  12. d-mo

    d-mo Member Full Member

    238
    0
    May 14, 2009
    Paulie has shown a better ability to take shots than Khan. I am not saying Paulie will but I would say given BOTH guys history, the odds even out I think.
     
  13. techks

    techks ATG list Killah! Full Member

    19,779
    701
    Dec 6, 2009
    Paulie got my respect after he fought Cotto and he's runing his own fan support with all of his **** talking.
     
  14. avidlemon

    avidlemon Boxing Addict banned

    6,832
    0
    Feb 3, 2009
    look at the abilities. khan is a superior boxer to paulie, but paulie can take more punishment. there is not much power for khan to worry about, even taking into account his chin, whereas khan will probably force a stoppage by being able to wealk through paulie's punches, and sheer volume of his own punches.
    I think this is a logical way to look at this right now
     
  15. Your thread title implies that Malignant deserves credit as of now. Which we all know that he hasn't done ****.