When the ref gives a fighter an unfair advantage

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by 3rdegree, Apr 3, 2018.


  1. 3rdegree

    3rdegree Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,276
    9,450
    Aug 23, 2014
    Any examples ?
     
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2018
  2. ryuken87

    ryuken87 Active Member Full Member

    1,468
    877
    Mar 8, 2014
    I think Crawford is too far above Horn for the ref to be a factor.
     
    kriszhao, Northadox and Staminakills like this.
  3. 3rdegree

    3rdegree Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,276
    9,450
    Aug 23, 2014
    That's possible but the ref may take Horn's only chance of victory away from him and turn it into something other than a boxing match.
     
    Robney likes this.
  4. OpinionOfACasual

    OpinionOfACasual Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,111
    3,981
    May 3, 2017
    For years Wlad was criticised for just leaning on opponents.

    Now that option has been taken away from Joshua fans complain still.
     
    rorschach51 likes this.
  5. reckless

    reckless Active Member Full Member

    1,141
    1,240
    Mar 18, 2018
    It was Parker who benefitted from the referee not allowing inside fighting.
     
  6. 3rdegree

    3rdegree Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,276
    9,450
    Aug 23, 2014
    The point is we'll never know because that option was unfairly disallowed. The decision to deny Parker's inside game was made long before the fight began.
     
  7. KingFury64

    KingFury64 Active Member banned Full Member

    1,448
    537
    Jul 7, 2015
    AJ would have ended the fight with an uppercut had the ref not prevented them from in fighting. Shocking ref.
     
  8. 3rdegree

    3rdegree Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,276
    9,450
    Aug 23, 2014
    You're missing the point. On paper and in the minds certain individuals,Parker would most likely have the advantage on the inside due to his shorter arms and speed. "They" obviously didn't want to take that chance.
     
    chitownfightfan likes this.
  9. KingFury64

    KingFury64 Active Member banned Full Member

    1,448
    537
    Jul 7, 2015
    What point? The ref didn`t do AJ any favours with breaking the fighters all the time. There is another point?
     
  10. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,307
    29,483
    Apr 4, 2005
    The referee in the Joshua/Parker fight was awful, did step in too many times.

    But it didn't favour one fighter over the other. Joshua was having success at times as well on the inside only for the ref to intervene. Like at the end of the 8th, he lands a solid left hook, right hand, then an uppercut as Parker tries and smothers him and the ref jumps in. They were not clinching, Joshua was having a good spell and ref spoils it.

    If anything I think Joshua would of liked to work more on the inside when given the chance. Joshua tried to create space inside as he usually does by using his left forearm to push Parker away but Parker would just duck under the forearm and then force a clinch with Joshua leaning down on Parkers neck, ref would of course then step in. It honestly was the smart thing for Parker to do as he would of been squared up with Joshua levering him into position for that uppercut. But it doesn't change the fact he was the one causing a lot of the clinching by coming underneath the forearm.
     
    Flamazide likes this.
  11. 3rdegree

    3rdegree Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,276
    9,450
    Aug 23, 2014
    First of all you don't know that for certain since they never let them fight on the inside. Secondly, this tactic had to have been decided before the fight took place. Aj probably didn't know.
     
  12. 3rdegree

    3rdegree Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,276
    9,450
    Aug 23, 2014
    As it turns out it may not have favoured Aj but we can't know for certain because inside fighting was prohibited.
     
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2018
    chitownfightfan likes this.
  13. OpinionOfACasual

    OpinionOfACasual Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,111
    3,981
    May 3, 2017
    And if Joshua was able to clinch for 12 rounds?
     
  14. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,307
    29,483
    Apr 4, 2005
    True it's hard to know for sure who would of truly benefited from allowing the fight to be fought more in close, we can only hypothesis.

    But it's clear there was one guy looking to fight more on the inside than the other and that was AJ. He was the one coming forward, he was the one looking to engage more and it was Parker who was ducking under AJ's left forearm to initiate the clinch.

    Most of the exchanges started one way. Joshua gets in close, unloads, Parker fires back, ref steps in before they can really get to work. Joshua was initiating the inside work the majority of the time while Parker was content to let him come and fire back counter flurries.
     
  15. nickpoppunk

    nickpoppunk Unbelievable Bentekkers Full Member

    1,554
    552
    Feb 14, 2012
    there is no other point. he was hoping the AJ haters would jump on and complain. but non did.
    the real fans actually realized that the ref didn't benefit either AJ or Parker. he just made it a cleaner fight