When Vitali Klitschko KO's McCline Will He Be The #1 Heavyweight?.........

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by A-50, Sep 5, 2007.


  1. A-50

    A-50 Active Member Full Member

    532
    2
    Jan 28, 2007
    I say yes, he was #1 when he left and nobody today would beat him. :deal
     
  2. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
  3. Fat Tony

    Fat Tony Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,055
    1
    Apr 30, 2006
    You can't rank him above Wlad, Chagaev, Maskaev (Peter), Ibragimov (Holyfield) and Valuev just because he KO'd McCline.

    If he wins impressively I'd put him in the Top10, but not above the beltholders and Valuev.
     
  4. freethinker

    freethinker Member Full Member

    427
    0
    Jul 4, 2007
    Wlad will still be in front of him... and others too. Betting McCline doesn't mean much.
     
  5. A-50

    A-50 Active Member Full Member

    532
    2
    Jan 28, 2007

    that is not the point. He was #1 when he left. McCline is a big joke, he has nothing to do with it.
     
  6. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
    No. Young bro and the other champs would probably deserve to rank above him.
     
  7. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    There are others who should be ranked above him.

    Even old WALDO.
     
  8. barneyrub

    barneyrub Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,077
    3
    Aug 2, 2004
    You have to put him above Wlad, he would beat Wlad, plus he beat Sanders who beat Wlad.

    Beating Austin and a one eyed Brewster is no more impressve than beating McCline.

    Ibragimov should be ranked above Wlad also because he actually holds the lineage of victory over him, he beat Briggs who beat Sergei L who beat Brewster who beat Wlad!!!!!!!!!!!
     
  9. Fat Tony

    Fat Tony Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,055
    1
    Apr 30, 2006
    :lol:

    According to your logic:

    Wlad >>>> Byrd > Vitali ---> Wlad >>>>>>>> Vitali

    Wlad >>>>>>>>> Austin = Ibragimov ------> Wlad >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ibragimov
     
  10. barneyrub

    barneyrub Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,077
    3
    Aug 2, 2004
    and sanders beat wlad and vitali beat sanders :tong

    The point is that Ibragimov holds the win over Brewster`s conquerors that means more than Wlads win over a one eyed already beaten Brewster. That was no loss avenged by Wlad it was a turkey shoot.

    Austin didnt beat Ibragamov so that argument of yours counts not a jot.

    Vitali was number one when he retired and once again is number 1 on his return, he would always beat Wlad who is mercifully ducking him by claiming he is doing it for his mother lol. What kind of champion hides behind a women? lol.
     
  11. A-50

    A-50 Active Member Full Member

    532
    2
    Jan 28, 2007
    Vitali would knock Waldo out cold. :smoke
     
  12. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    18,614
    8
    Apr 10, 2005
    Wow the more and more you post the bigger idiot you look like.
     
  13. KO byBRIGGS

    KO byBRIGGS Making a comeback Full Member

    1,006
    0
    Jun 8, 2006
    He may be #1 but he needs to take out his brother to get the spot.
     
  14. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    I'd rank him above Ibragimov, but not above Chagaev, Wlad and Peter/Maskaev winner.
     
  15. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    Agreed.