At what point in his career was Juan Manuel Marquez most effective and capable as a fighter? Note that the question is not when his prime was, as the word "prime" usually refers to the physical prime of a fighter. What I'm asking goes beyond that and tries to get at when the blend of youthful bodily athleticism, technical skill & development, and versatility most successfully complemented each other. Another way of looking at it might be asking the question: when did JMM have the best chance of beating or competing with the ATG's in and around his weight-class? This question popped into my head because Marquez is a fighter who early on possessed impressive speed and very sharp reflexes & coordination (along with punching power which has at least in part stayed with him over the years and weight jumps). The height of his physical abilities didn't overlap with the most important parts of his career, which were delayed, and they likely didn't overlap with his peak development in technical ability, as is true for most fighters. Then there's the fact that Marquez evolved from a hard-hitting boxer puncher in his youth to a conservative counter-puncher, and eventually an aggressive counter-puncher with more of an offensive emphasis. It's also hard to guess when watching his later fights at 135 whether certain adaptations during fights are tricks he picked up later on to adjust to different physical dynamics, or ones he had all along that he chose to employ more often in certain fights over others. In any case, discuss and state your pick. If you think one fight or a couple of definitive fights, or a general time period across weight classes stands out above the rest and don't fit into one of the categories given, go ahead and explain.
Well, Chris John is an elite HOF featherweight, yet nowhere near the very top ATG's, and I thought John deserved the draw or narrow win against JMM. So by your one standard of "when did JMM have the best chance of beating...the ATG's in and around his weight-class," I'd have to consider that one of his two pinnacle fights at the weight heavily. It's clearly not 140+. I might change my mind on a whim with something like this, but I'll go with 135.
...is what I think. No doubt his skill, experience and knowledge has improved since then. But naturally his speed, reflexes, etc, have also declined as he's gone up in weight and gotten older.
I'd have to say when he decided to move up to 130 and 135. At 126, he was younger, he had explosive power, and he was faster. But the experience he had as he progressed, plus the wars he had against Pac, Barrera, and Diaz definitely added a lot to his fighting prowess.
How highly do people rate Chris John's win over Marquez? How would Chris John have done against Pacquiao?
On a purely personal level,I'm going for mid-lates.I didn't root for him when he fought Barrera,but I'm one of the few Barrera fans who on watching for the second time,think Marquez won.That was the period when I was genuinely amazed by his ring smarts and counter punching genius. I have a feeling one of the mods who likes Juanma might go for the Salido period and on watching a couple of those fights,he's a totally different fighter at times.But for box office appeal,the Diaz period will take some beating.
He's been consistent for a long time and there has been any significant decline. I would say against Casamayor he had the maturity and experience and still the strength and freshness of a young fighter.
Pacquioa @126? You know what? There's a reason why Pacquioa-Marquez II took a couple of years to happen.. :hey Yeshmagambetov, 3k Battery, and Barrera were Pacquioa's victim @126.. Knocked Marquez down three times in one round.. Marquez was just too lucky to escape with a draw.. :yep Chris John? Juarez almost knocked him out.. Imagine if its Pacquioa.. :smoke