When was Tyson's exact prime?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by tommygun711, Jan 21, 2012.


  1. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    100
    Dec 26, 2009
    This clown above me has the stupidity to say Tyson was prime through the 90s. His sharpness, combinations, and speed were nothing compared the the late 80s.
     
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    60,543
    44,410
    Feb 11, 2005
    No fighter even remotely of Tyson's style has an 11 year prime. Look at Frazier, Marciano, Dempsey... I would say 86-90. After that he lost focus, then prison. He relied on so much movement, speed and agility, with such an expenditure of energy, that once he was out of the bloom of youth, it was over. He was never going to recapture that magic for more than a few rounds before becoming a stationary one-two fighter.
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,214
    20,902
    Sep 15, 2009
    Prime years are 85-91.

    Absolute peak has to be berbick through spinks.
     
  4. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,432
    29
    Dec 18, 2011
    says it all really
     
  5. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    '87 - Pinklon Thomas, Tyrell Biggs fights
     
  6. Lester1583

    Lester1583 Can you hear this? Full Member

    4,426
    26
    Dec 18, 2008
    Tyson also was a technical mess and had reduced stamina post-prison.

    It's not only "the energy sapping youth-oriented style" that made him look past prime faster than most fighters.
     
  7. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    245
    Feb 5, 2005
    May 8th 1986 at 2:00pm.
     
  8. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    55,546
    9,898
    Jul 28, 2009
    :patsch:lol: ****ing hell, Tommy. :lol::lol::lol: That's Foreman Hook. You're acting like a complete noob, mate. Making a thread over a Foreman Hook statement on Tyson...:rofl You might as well do one being all incredulous about a Frankenfrank post regarding Tua.
     
  9. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,530
    Jul 28, 2004
    You get the prize! These two fights..Tyson was sublime..just great.
     
  10. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    :lol::rofl
     
  11. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    100
    Dec 26, 2009
    i'm just retaliating because he posted one about me
     
  12. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    55,546
    9,898
    Jul 28, 2009
    :-( I bet he passed a note about you at play-lunch with a silly moniker too.
     
  13. Arka

    Arka New Member Full Member

    0
    7
    Sep 26, 2008
    Around 87 .Maybe in the Tucker bout.

    Mike showed he was a disciplined fighter with an excellent jab and very difficult to hit clean.
     
  14. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    64
    Dec 1, 2008
    I felt his peak was from Holmes to Spinks and then the decline. Not an age decline, but a decline from not studying the sport as much and getting distracted. Im 1988 he could have beaten most anyone in history.
     
  15. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,210
    1,569
    Sep 13, 2006
    86 - 88 he was at his absolute best. But I still think he was a hell of a fighter even after that, except for the Douglas fight, all the way up to the second Ruddock fight.

    Post prison he could still really punch, but I think even his punch was not quite as crisp and short as it was pre-prison. I especially noticed the drop off in pace, versatility and consistency, and certainly his defense and legs were not the same. What most struck me about Tyson is that I saw him get pushed and bulled back on several occasions, which is something I never saw in a prime Tyson. Still pretty good, but you can notice the drop off if you watch carefully.