When will Pacquiao fight someone coming off a win?

Yea....A good win is a win where you dominate, don't get hurt and/or beat a big name. PAC's opponents have those.

 

floyd fought zab coming off a loss to baldomir

wouldnt fight shane or margarito int heir prime because "why should i fight them, they been beat 3,4 times already"
but fights baldomir with 9 losses

sharmba mitchell was 1-1 in his last 2 fights going in

DLH was 2-2 in his last 4 fights

chop chop was coming off a loss when he fought floyd

but guys like brussels :rofl phillip ndou v sosa had nice lil winning streaks going

and we just wont count the 36 year old featherweight and the almost 39 year old sugar shane (hes 39 now in mahy, he was ..almost there)

the more i look at his weak ass resume....wow....:rofl:rofl
its pretty easy to be undefeated when their are no prime guys like margo, cotto, pac, williams, vernon, winky, and maybe a 33 year old version of sugar shane.....
smart floyd is..... :good
brave floyd NOT :nono

 

That is awesome. Can't even follow his own logic within 4 sentences.

 

Why does he HAVE to fight at 140? :huh He's not even fighting this fight at 140...

Berto had a wide UD win against Urango and a TKO against Quinatana. I know some Pacfans will say easy win, but what the hell is this fight? Berto would be far harder than Margarito. At least Berto is a proper champion.

Why not Martinez at 154 (or 151 for Pacmans benefit)? He 'beat' Cintron at 154 last year and had a very impressive win over Kelly.

 

Try reading the original post before you make another idiotic comment like this. Let me help you:

 

Great rebuttal! Fact is, anyone's resume can be dissected and discredited if that's your agenda. but for Manny....that's a hard case to spin. Floyd not so much but I think it's pretty unfair either way. Floyd has a very soid resume...it's very good to say the least. It's not great but he's not really concerned about LEGACY as much as he is MONEY and keeping undefeated.

 

See this is what I mean (see my previous post).

If Pac fought Berto, people would say why not Margo or Cotto. etc.

You guys cannot admit it that there is NO ONE clear opponent that would make everyone happy EXCEPT MAYWEATHER.

But you refuse to admit that because that would open up a can of worms some of you do not want to deal with. It is that simple.


PWill and Martinez I will concede but that is because I don't think Pac has even a chance winning those just base of the pure size advantage. Pac is a true 140er, let alone 154.

People shower praise to RJJ for beating Ruiz - one of his best wins yet no one will admit that there where far better HW fighters than Ruiz.

 

So you rank Cotto's win over Clottey a good win? No way I believe pre-Margo Cotto struggles that much against Clottey. Dude barely won and only after he threw Clottey to the ground.

Do you rank Clottey's loss to Cotto a good win? :huh

I'll give Hatton his win over Pauli as a good one. And I also gave Manny credit for beating Hatton.

Oscar hadn't been under 150 since 01.... Came in at ****ing 142. He won a wide UD over Forbes, but Forbes was 1-2 before Oscar and 1-2 after Oscar.... Take that how you choose to.

 

I'm sorry I don't recall the entire first post. If you would have quoted that I may have known what you were speaking about. But okay that was an idiotic comment. :roll:

 

I agree there is not ONE clear opponent that would make everyone happy except Mayweather. But there are far better choices than Margarito, who they had to fight to get licensed to give away a title neither deserves. The thread is asking when he will fight someone coming off a good win. There's examples of people coming off Good wins. Margarito would not be one of thsoe people in my eyes.

 

:good Kudos for admitting that.

Floyd Mayweather fans, take note.

 

If I'm wrong I'm wrong. But people have to PROVE me wrong before I admit it. :good And proof is not an opinion like most people on here seem to believe. :yep

 

Well, Spud1 will never admit when he's wrong.

You know how he was harping on about how I supposedly labeled Juan Manuel Marquez and Miguel Cotto ATGs? Well, when I gave him the link to my thread in the Classic which is me explaining reasons for JMM not being an ATG, and then directing him to the original thread where not one quote could be produced by me saying Cotto was an ATG either, he still refused to admit he was wrong. In fact, he's even gone back to saying it in this thread, even though every shred of evidence is contrary to what he is saying. Now that's childish and embarrassing, a real man admits when he is wrong.

Winona Ryder doesn't have boobies? Obviously completely irrelevant and not related to Boxing, but even when I produced an image clearing showing that she's got a pretty substantial bust, even then, he couldn't bring himself to admit he was wrong. I can only hope that he is a 14 year old lad, that would be enough justification and reason for his childish antics, but I tend to think he's actually a lot older than that. They say, "seeing is believing", but not with Spud. He'll refute his own grandmother if he has too. Stubborn ****.

 

But that would bring us in the land of subjective. This is why even all the people agreeing with TS/OP cannot even agree who that person would be.

Some say a 140 like Khan, but then some people from the same side of the isle say that it should not be even a 140er.

If at 147 what you have is Berto, Marg, Cotto and Shane.

Berto was roasted here in ESB after his last fight for being mediocre. FAR from a good win. If he took on Berto, people would say why not Marg or PWill.

Cotto - people would say he already beat him, should take on Shane or Marg.
Shane - well we know what people would say about that (coming of a defeat and a PBF leftover and old).

You end up where you started - PBF or no one. And no one will be happy with no one.