When will Pacquiao fight someone coming off a win?

:rofl You would take the sentence and make the assumption that's what I meant. Funny how the person I was talking to fully understood what I meant. :-(

I post what I believe to be the truth or factual. When proof can be presented that I can easily find I post that proof. If someone else finds proof that what I've posted is a lie or incorrect I will admit I am wrong. I will not admit I am wrong when someone simply states their opinion. I'm not a child why the **** would I knowingly post lies? atsch

 

You haven't seen anything proving ANYTHING if you are completely honest. So now Margarito has to prove his power? You are aware he wasn't a big KO artist. He beat guys with accumulation.

Margarito has always been defensesless and slow, didn't stop him from defeating better fighters.

Ther thing is, with Margarito we KNOW there's no quit in him. He tries to win every second.

With Berto, no one knows how he will respond to fighting an top fighter. He could easily wilt and become discoureage. Then you guys would dog Pac for fighting Berto...

They had their sites set elsewhere. That happens in boxing, you cannot fight everyone the same night.

 

Sure...whatever...as long as you are't proven wrong...you'll say what you please. Good for you!

As for what you post to be the truth, "It's not a lie, if you believe it." - George Costanza...

 

Another reason Roach admitted why they took the fight. It was one of the few times (if ever) Oscar had that much noticable damage done to his face. Roach said Forbes can't even punch and knows Pacman is a far better puncher.

 

It's a damn shame when you need Steve Forbes to soften a mofo up for you.

 

The fact is that the standard of competition has been going down for Manny Pacquiao in his recent fights.

 

:yep

 

The win I give most credit too for Manny fighting was Barrera who was on a 8 win streak. But everyone else he fought excluding JMM was 1to3 fights from a loss. If these stupid Pacquiao fans want to be technical and count insignificant wins such as Micheal Jennings for Cotto(Clottey/Cotto negate eachother since Clottey lost not deserving a title shot and Cotto looked like **** and proved he was damaged goods) or Steve Forbes for Oscar, Maliggnagi and Lazcano for Hatton and Roberto Garcia for Margarito so be it. It really shows youre nothing but dick riding fans who will stick up for Manny in any possible way. The TS made a great objective point calling out Manny's or Top Ranks bull**** and clearly stated that Manny is a yes man which all is fact. Otherwise he would'nt be signed to 2 companies.Theres really no argument against it. Manny cherry picks just as much as everyone else. He just cherry picks the best names who happen to be on the decline and he sure as **** better not fight Shane which even more supports this. End the ****ing thread.

 

So...if you have a loss withing the last 2-3 of your fights, please explain exactly what that means.

 

I haven't seen anything prove anything. But I saw he wasn't as effective his last two fights. Is this correct? So I have reason to believe he's not the same post-plaster. He didn't do the same damage post-plaster he's been doing in his past fights, I didn't say he had to be a KO artist.

I believe plaster helped him defeat better fighters. He got beat down by Mosley and wasn't really impressive in his win over Garcia.

Not quitting doesn't mean he'll win or put up a challenge. He can get beat soundly for 12 rounds, which I believe he will.

We do not know how Berto responds, but if he can't respond well why not be the one to prove it? It's not Pacmans fault if he wilts and gets discouraged. I wouldn't dog Pacman out for fighting him, just like I don't dog him out for beating Hatton even though he refused to listen to his corner. (and yes I agree Manny would have won regardless)

You can't. But do you honestly believe if Pacman showed real interest in fighting either they wouldn't have dropped everything to fight him? I believe they would have... most others feel the same I'd assume. He had plenty of time to get a matchup with either.

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEnPEz_rSoU[/ame]


Ask Roach.

 

I asked you, based on your post. PLease explain what it means to fight a guy who lost 1 or his last 3-4 fights.

 

The thing with Berto is, if he got the fight, and wilted, what was the point in fighting a guy who's best win is WAAY below Pac? Berto should not even be in the running for a fight w/ Pac. HeE can still get fights at WW against guys like Mosley, WILLIAMS, Cintron.... just please, no fights vs. a JrWW.

I hear you on Margarito not looking great. But so what? What exactly does that mean? Shane looked great his last fight before Floyd.

Clottey looked great vs. Zab right before the Cotto fight. Looked good vs. Cotto too, then was just overwhelemed vs. Pac.

There are countless examples of a fighter looking great one fight, looking bad the next. And vice versa.

BTW, Margarito had fights before SHane where he didn't look great. Did he forget the plaster for them? :huh

Really...who knows man. We can't pretend like us message boarders are privy to ALL information all the time.

And if they had no interest, again, so what? The so-called greatest Fighter, Floyd, hasn't shown ANY interest ith them as well, or any in fighting a midget.