When you look at Compubox stats, it makes Money May look like Superman

Give me the raw data not the %..otherwise this is ****

 

Juan doesnt look bad either

 

amazing, Can't believe Diaz is so high! Floyd is on another level.

where'd you get that? who has the best +/- in absolute (not percentage?)

 

at ARCE..but Hatton and Cotto being up higher then bhop..something is out of whack..:think

 

Pac -2%

 

Not a surprise to see Jorge Arce and Samuel Peter at the bottom

This is an interesting statistic. Mayweather is a special fighter. I'm a little surprised to see Juan Diaz #2.

 

If i throw 750 punches and my opponent throws 400 in a fight, and say I land 250 punches and he lands 200 on me. thats +50 punches landed in absolute, but in %, its -17%

get the difference?

 

hmm i think you're having a hard time understanding the concept of connect %.

 

hey man if it says the stats are computed over the last 5 fights then there's no reason that only works for 1 fight. You can have a +/- in terms of absolute punches over the last 5 fights

Also all you need to do is take an average per fight. its not difficult.

 

it doesn't make a difference in terms of connect percentage.

On the contrary, high volume punchers usually have a LOWER connect percentage

 

and thats why I asked if he had a different graph that compared in absolute punches rather than %, which is when you came in telling me i suck at math while I'm here studying boundary value problems and partial differential equations.

 

The most accurate fighter ever?

 

I was extremely surprised also. I think its important to realise in the end that compubox is still just some guy with a clicker counting punches. Sometimes his view is blocked, sometimes he's biased, and sometimes its just hard to tell if it landed cleanly