i have him top 60 and in the top 10 greatest WW's. he was a beast in his prime. 147 prime Tito would of given any top welter fits. at 5'11'', he was a big welter and usually a slow starter, but could drop you in the first or the late rounds and with the stamina of a marathon runner, he was a nightmare. if he was getting outboxed badly he could turn the fight around. if an opponent tested his chin, he'd test there's alittle bit after.
Floyd is the better fighter, he's great. He's an overrated WW though. I'd pick Tito to win a decision in that one. Tito was an absolute beast at 147. Floyd is not big enough or strong enough to keep Tito off off him for 12 rounds. If he fought Tito the way he fought Oscar, laying on the ropes trying to counter he could very well get KO'd. I'd favor Tito by UD.
We have a thread on Floyd vs Tito at 147. Go check it, it has tons of good info from plenty of good posters.
I have him top 50 or 60. But at ww, he could very well be a top 5. List is just to hard to figure out with so many great fighters.
just out of curiousity, what does your top 100 look like? I have Tito at 83. I am critical of Trinidad, However to say he is not in the Top 150 is probably the most craziest shyt i have heard. He faced the best possible opposition available at the time and he didn't duck anyone. The only thing iwas skeptical aboutwas the nadwrap incident when he fought at middleweight. I thought that power he had was unatural. Plus Bouie Fisher and company hadd the say on that as well.