Where do you draw the line?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by escudo, Jun 3, 2016.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,687
    46,333
    Feb 11, 2005
    I think it happened at slightly different times in different divisions.

    For heavyweights, the tectonic shift was Dempsey, tho the Willard model has never quite died off. Certainly Dempsey ushered in a new era, stance, attack, pace. He is the earliest resemblance of later modern heavies, or at least one mode of them. Tunney represented another mode, and I would say Willard represented a cruder incarnation of another yet a third breed. All three of these type last till this day. The Fitz and even Johnson we see on film, not so much.
     
  2. Vince Voltage

    Vince Voltage Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,081
    1,329
    Jan 1, 2011
    To me it all starts with Gene Tunney. That's when modern boxing began.
     
  3. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
  4. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,719
    3,559
    Jul 10, 2005
    Not sure on that, Benny Leonard should get more credit for that style than Tunney, perhaps even going back as far as Corbett.
     
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,878
    44,619
    Apr 27, 2005
    Exactly, glad you understand.
     
  6. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    I draw the line at whether a man can box/fight at all.
    It's nothing to do with what years he lived in.

    Boxing was always about hitting and not getting hit. Imposing your will on the other guy. Hitting the other guy hard enough to knock him out or outwitting him at every turn. Being able to absorb a shot when you have to. Having the heart to carry on and come back when things get tough.
    And being able to adapt your style to what the opponent brings.

    None of this has changed.