lmao at this thread and these morons in it full of biased fans, blizzblizz you've been trolling for years MF This content is protected
Well that's fair, but i have Roman > Lara. Lara clearly lost to Canelo, in my opinion, it was 8 rounds to 4. Crawford was not ouboxed by Gamboa wtf lol Roman resume and achievements are much better than Lara, so i have him in my top 5.
Lara schooled canelo bro! WTH where you watching YDKSAB if you come out with something that dumb! wasn't crawford down 4-0 on the cards?
you don't know anything about boxing! kellerman even said gamboa was outclassing crawford size got him, roman achievements? Lara has beaten williams canelo trout, angulo vanes fighters way better than anyone roman has fought he was also a well schooled amateur world champion, roman gonzalez just lost to two mexican boxers estrada and caudras he's not as good as lara no way in hell! who the hell has roman gonzalez beat as good as paul williams or canelo or trout? smh
If Cuardas is giving Chocolatito the pumpkin face like that. Chocolatito might die if he stepped into the ring with Rigondeaux. He would also be wise to stay away from Tete, who is tall, and rangy with one punch KO power, but not the typical fluky South African boxer.
Yep but they don't want to believe and the fanboys here like blizzyblizz will make every excuse to dismiss it, rigo is no bigger than caudras and at 118 the fight is very very easy to make, they are casual fans
man u people are soo ignorant, so williams and canelo and trout, who has roman gonzalez fought and beat as good as those guys? before viloria his last 10 opponents before that had on average 9.3 losses each, that's every opponent for 10 straight fights, how about that for you can't make that stuff up! there's a fact for your casual ass
He didn't beat Williams or Canelo, his best win is Trout and Roman has about 7 wins better than Trout
are you trolling or are you a serious serious casual?? williams was one of the biggest robberies in the last 10 years a fight lara dominated and a clear win, canelo also clearly lost, khan was down 4-0 on one card vs canelo until he got stopped, cotto was down 11-1 on every card and that fight was really a draw, floyd got a draw on one card, canelo has the judges clearly lara getting a SD tells you everything you need to know, and with a score like 117-111 we know it's corrupt Roman has 7 wins better? you mean guys like leon who has 32 losses? what about barrera who has 14 losses? and these fights were in the last 2 years, casuals like u kill boxing
Vanes is a better boxer in every way to anyone roman gonzalez has fought, he's competed with the best arguably beat charlo and had a sd with andrade beat tim bradley as an amateur, he's technically better schooled than anyone gonzalez has been in with
Cuadras lost, get over it. And you have like 250 posts. I've been trolling for years lol... How the **** would you know that? Lol