Where do you rank Bob Foster at light-heavyweight?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by dmt, Dec 23, 2020.


  1. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    10,904
    16,034
    Jul 2, 2006
    On many days, Bob Foster is my all time favourite light-heavyweight. Tall, skilled, masterful jabber, and he knew how to use his height beautifully. He had quick hands, a good right hand, the THAT left hook, that left was just extraordinary. The greatest p4p left hook i have ever seen.

    I personally have Bob at #7 on my all time light-heavy list. I have been thinking about moving him higher. I love watching him but compared to Charles, Spinks, Moore, Langford etc. i am not overwhelmed by Bob's light heavyweight opposition. He dominated his era and was unbeatable at his peak but it wasn't a loaded era.

    Where do you rank Bob as a light-heavyweight?

    This content is protected
     
  2. Mike Cannon

    Mike Cannon Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,022
    7,122
    Apr 29, 2020
    Easy, top 2/3 juggling Moore, Charles, and Spinks to make your top 4. No ?
     
    Reinhardt and BUDW like this.
  3. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    10,904
    16,034
    Jul 2, 2006
    I rank Langford in my top 2, which i know not everyone will agree with.

    Charles, Langford, Moore, Spinks, Tunney, Conn and Foster.

    I am thinking about moving Foster into the top 5 but am not certain as of yet.
     
  4. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,067
    44,707
    Mar 3, 2019
    IMO, people rate Foster wayyyyyy too high. He's the Perez of the LHW division. Who did he beat? "Finnegan, old Tiger, Quarry".... yada yada yada. It's an abysmal résumé. Sure, he may have spent a long time at the top, but someone like Deontay ****in Wilder spent a lot of time at the top. It means much more - to me - if you beat great fighters, than if you're lingering around a division like a bad smell. That said, a long reign does have to count for something, and he does look unbelievable on film. I'd have him:

    #15. Roy Jones Jr
    #14. Lloyd Marshall
    #13. Billy Conn
    #12. Saad Muhammad
    #11. Maxie Rosenbloom
    #10. Bob Foster
    #09. Harold Johnson
    #08. John Henry Lewis
    #07. Jimmy Bivins
    #06. Gene Tunney
    #05. Tommy Loughran
    #04. Michael Spinks
    #03. Harry Greb
    #02. Archie Moore
    #01. Ezzard Charles
     
    Last edited: Dec 23, 2020
    Claw4075, crixus85, Clinton and 5 others like this.
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,448
    43,593
    Apr 27, 2005
    #5 - #10 for me. Very high H2H too.
     
    dmt likes this.
  6. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    10,904
    16,034
    Jul 2, 2006
    This i agree with. There are days where i think he may have been the greatest h2h light-heavyweight ever.
     
    Reinhardt and JohnThomas1 like this.
  7. Gatekeeper

    Gatekeeper Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,367
    2,986
    Oct 18, 2009
    This. He was an amazing talent and H2H could potentially beat anyone but his resume is weak compared to the likes of Moore, Charles etc.
     
  8. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,067
    44,707
    Mar 3, 2019
    :nonono

    Only one man claims that...
     
  9. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,089
    15,548
    Dec 20, 2006
    yes sir! Tommy Loughran it is
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  10. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,067
    44,707
    Mar 3, 2019
    Please sir, don't forget about the real best LHW ever......


    Tommy Fury
     
  11. ChrisJS

    ChrisJS Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,233
    7,112
    Sep 11, 2018
    I think abysmal is a stretch. With no cruiserweight division or super middleweight division to have been champion, lineal and undisputed for that long in such dominant fashion counts for a lot. Sometimes when a champ is so dominant he probably stopped two or three guys from doing something special.

    I do agree with him in the lower half of the top 10 overall, but maybe a few spots higher. Head to head, I’m sure I’d have him higher.
     
    Greg Price99 and JohnThomas1 like this.
  12. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,666
    11,094
    Aug 22, 2004

    This. I've always kind of discounted Foster and felt like a contrarian about doing so but the reality of it is, it's easier to look amazing when you fight the selection of LHW's he did. Tiger was old and hopelessly undersized and the rest of them aren't exactly a who's who. Spinks was infinitely more accomplished.

    Somewhere around #10 is about accurate. Top 3 is giving him WAY too much credit for basically doing nothing.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  13. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,301
    9,161
    Jul 15, 2008
    Lot's of sharp posts here ... certainly extremely dangerous but agree the resume is not the best .. he's an extremely live top ten guy who may surprise anyone ... I have Charles, Moore, Spinks, Langford, Tunney, Jones , Greb up there and there are many other dangerous and talented guys as well ..
     
    Richard M Murrieta likes this.
  14. Fuzzykat

    Fuzzykat Member Full Member

    444
    444
    Jun 18, 2019
    Foster was a little before my time. I became a big boxing fan around 1978, and I usually don't try to rate guys who came before I was paying close attention to the boxing world. But my impression from watching film is that he was better than any LH from his time on. I prefer him slightly over Michael Spinks.
     
    Richard M Murrieta and dmt like this.
  15. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,161
    6,407
    Jan 22, 2009
    Great post, George
     
    ETM and George Crowcroft like this.