Where do you rank WLADIMIR KLITCHKO in the ATG HEAVYWEIGHTS??

This poll should have been public.

I'd like to know who exactly has voted Top 5 and Top 500. :rofl

 

I don't regard him as an atg at all so I'm not voting. I cerainly don't think there are 500 heavyweights you could call "great". The term is used far too liberally by armchair pundits. He's a good fighter but he han't beaten anybody who I'd say was above average and there's nobody around at present who he hasn't fought that is.

 

I voted top 20, even I realize he isn't top 10 let alone top 5. Top 500 is m,eant to be a joke of course & look how many assholes fell for it.

 

Klitschko threads are just impossible to comment in. Too much bias from lovers and haters to weed through the crap.

 

Top 30 or 40. His resume is weak and he fights in the weakest Heavyweight division in history. He has been ko'd twice in title fights and is not Undisputed. He has been dominant since his KO loss against Brewster and avenged that loss.

 

Wlad is no ATG, he is far from that. But he may achieve this status depending on his career from now on.

Also, the list of HW ATG contains about 20 names only. You don't get to be ATG by becoming champion alone, it takes much more than that.

 

Bull****, putting him into the top10 would mean rankings him ahead of people like Tyson, Holyfield and Bowe.

 

Top 50

While he has defended his belt 6 times he has not had the competition that could get him into the top 25, but if he keeps on winning..much like Larry Holmes did he will get more credit and at the very least get into the TOP25 all-time Heavyweights

 

who did Tyson beat(above average) except for washed up Holmes?
For those tards that say "Wlad is not Undisputed" - WLAD DID NOT FINISHED HIS CAREER YET!!

 

But why did Holmes are in top 10?
Name 49 HW that you can possibly rank higher than Wlad.
if he is in top 50 that's mean that you can name 49 names that better or close to him.
otherwise you FAILED.

 

What ****er will rank Tyson lower than 10? He was the youngest undisputed champ who collected belts one by one. Holyfield was a 4 time champ and that's ALOT!! Btw he was undisputed in 2 categories so he in top 10 for sure. And Bowe should lower than wlad coz 1 win against holy and one lucky punch against a fighter(great fighter but still) which is SO COMPLETLY FIT FOR YOU. If bowe would not be so *(pick what you like) he should beat holyfield 10 out of 10.

 

Agree that there is too much legends right now and feet in 10 is almost impossibly. But there is a slight chance........ Overall there will be always a fighter's who will be ranked over wlad no meters what:
Ali
Luis
Lewis(who btw i think was strongest HW of alltime)
Tyson(coz he was youngest and very different)
Holyfield(He is simply a meaning of warrior word)
Holmes(simply the best, and all who disagrees can suck my **** ):smoke
Forman(for his Long run)
And someone from very old days(not really into those guys).

 

You shoulda made the polls like this:

1-5
6-10
11-20
etc
etc