Where do you rate Lennox Lewis on your ATG HW-list

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Job, Dec 16, 2007.


  1. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    I don't see how Tyson can be top ten as his best win was Ruddock or a lightheavyweight Spinks.

    Now i don't really believe that argument, but i'm just showing how stupid yours is.

    p.s. What got you banned this time, Legend?
     
  2. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,878
    44,620
    Apr 27, 2005
    A shorter reply might be gained by simply asking, "what didn't get you banned this time" :lol:
     
  3. DamonD

    DamonD Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,285
    40
    Nov 19, 2004
    The good thing for Lewis about mythical head-to-head fights is that it eliminates the flaws that cost him against McCall and Rahman - overconfidence and undertraining.

    No question that the prime version has trained hard and is extremely focused.
    And doesn't have Pepe Correa in his corner ;)
     
  4. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,405
    11,432
    Jan 6, 2007
    Since all of those guys have been inactive ( very inactive in Joe's case) for the past four years, why the revisions?

    Or do you mean you've rethought things from a fresher perspective?

    My own list: (I have 3/4 and 5/6 undecided)

    1: Ali

    2: Louis

    3/4: Lewis/Foreman

    5/6: Marciano/Holmes

    7: Liston

    8: Tyson

    9: Frazier

    10: Patterson
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,113
    Mar 21, 2007
    Legend's account was deleted? **** sake.

    One week before the mod's are all sacked and two before the film comes out too...
     
  6. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,719
    3,559
    Jul 10, 2005
    I think Marciano had great comp, Moore, Charles, Walcott, LarSarza were pretty good for any champion to fight. I dont know why people always bring it down to saying it was pretty poor.
     
  7. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,146
    25,338
    Jan 3, 2007
    Well, you don't think that Foreman, Frazier, Holmes, Ali or Lewis were good fighters either, so I don't even know why anyone bothers to discuss boxing with you.
     
  8. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,146
    25,338
    Jan 3, 2007
    I've read posts in the past where you have openly belittled the legacies of these fighters, and accused them of being grossly overrated. I'm begining to wonder exactly how familiar you are with their boxing careers as they size up to other fighters over the last 100 years of the sport. I'm also wondering if you truly study boxing with some other mechanism besides boxrec.
     
  9. Cojimar 1945

    Cojimar 1945 Member Full Member

    370
    5
    Jun 22, 2005
    Lewis's resume seems to be the best of his era though he did not face his best contemporaries at their peak. However, even if Lewis was the best of his era, a lot of time has passed since boxing started and there are many different periods to take into considertion.
     
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,687
    46,333
    Feb 11, 2005
    I rate him top 5 legacy-wise, top 3 head to head. There are just too many ways to consider the status of "all time great". From a socialogical standpoint, Jack Johnson would be way up there. Head to head, I'm not sure he can beat a RJJ or a Joe Calzaghe. That doesn't make him any less great. He did what he could with his talent limitations, in the limited era in which he lived.
     
  11. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,405
    11,432
    Jan 6, 2007

    What was his crime?
     
  12. barneyrub

    barneyrub Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,077
    3
    Aug 2, 2004
    If he was in his prime then you must think he had a 7 year prime? thats not bad considering Tyson and Holyfield only get credited with 2 year primes at the most before all the excuses get made for them! On that basis Lewis is clearly a great.
     
  13. barneyrub

    barneyrub Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,077
    3
    Aug 2, 2004
    While not at his peak he faced and defeated the best contender who was 7 years younger than he was and who went on to become champion and hailed as the best at the time.
     
  14. KobeIsGod

    KobeIsGod Who Necks?!? Full Member

    7,318
    6
    Jan 7, 2007
    i am huge lennox fan but i barely consider h2h in ranking. more important to me is how he performed in his era: the quality of opposition, the fashion in how he won, and intangibles displayed. i rate him between #4-6.

    my rankings doesnt include pre-joe louis fighters since i dont know enough about them to make a good call. my top 3 are set firmly in stone but then i always waver between holmes, lennox, and foreman who i consider the next three. today ill say:

    1-ali
    2-louis
    3-marciano
    4-holmes
    5-lennox
    6-foreman
     
  15. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    290
    Apr 18, 2007
    I was wondering when you would show up. I do indeed consider both Liston and Foreman (in both incarnations) to be middle of the road. A mobile opponent with endurance, resiliency and a good jab would have given either of them headaches.

    As much of a joke as Carnera has been derided for being, he might have posed more of a problem for both than most would suspect, with his strength, reach and endurance.

    Floyd Patterson never won over the 15 round distance either. When he was healthy, nobody ever wore him down over a longer distance. While I'm sure most everybody would prefer taking out an opponent quickly, so much history was made in the championship rounds (and consequently lost when they were abolished) that the question will always linger in my mind about how they might have responded in a marathon bout against live resistance.