Where do you rate Ray Robinson's wins over Jake LaMotta?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Thread Stealer, Nov 12, 2009.


  1. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,960
    3,439
    Jun 30, 2005
    In terms of divisions and his all-time standing on them. Not St. Valentine's Day Massacre, but the early wins when he was a welter, and LaMotta was a middle. Robinson weighed 145 for his first 2 wins over the MW LaMotta (and slightly over the WW limit for his next 2).

    Do you rate it towards his welterweight standing, since he was a welterweight at the time, or middleweight, since he was fighting a middleweight?

    I'm also curious how you take a lot of Henry Armstrong's WW defenses into account, considering he weighed 135 or below for quite a few of them, and sometimes faced other lightweights.

    It plays into his WW ranking since he had so many title defenses at 147, but what about lightweight? When we discuss the greatest lightweights ever, shouldn't Armstrong come into play since he really the size of a lightweight when he beat Ambers (also a LW), beat bigger guys in title defenses, etc...?
     
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,141
    82,980
    Nov 30, 2006
    Check the Lightweight Survey thread. HA gets plenty of love at LW.
    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=179997

    The average weight disparity between LaMotta and Robinson is insane. You have to count them as MW wins since he was fighting a MW.

    If both combatants are under a certain limit, you can consider it as being fought in that division for historical purposes (regardless of whether a higher limit division's belt happened to be on the line).
     
  3. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    On Armstrong i'd say that if his opponent was above 135 then you should rate that as a welterweight win. If both are lightweights fighting for the welterweight title then yeah you could technically rate that win at lightweight. But when it comes down to it with Armstrong, he just won because he was very very good, regardless of a few pounds.

    On Robinson it's difficult, i reckon IntentionalButt is right that if you're talking his resume you got to put them in as middleweight wins, but if you just want to straight up talk about how good he was at his best then you can say he was a better welterweight, because h2h, he was a welterweight beating a middleweight.
     
  4. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    It just shows that the greats will not hesitate for 5 years to tackle a good middle nor even a great one like Jake. That is of course what makes him so great is is willingness to take on all comers
     
  5. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,960
    3,439
    Jun 30, 2005
    What about fighters who spend days at 154 fighting shop-worn fighters coming up from 147 (sometimes being stopped in ugly fashion by them and dropped by jabs), and then talk all the time about facing the big names at 160, but never do?
     
  6. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    83
    May 30, 2009
    It doesn't matter what you rate it as, it's just a technicality. All that matters it is just truly significant and great.
     
  7. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,141
    82,980
    Nov 30, 2006
    How about Homicide Hank vs. the Bull in the early 40's? How spectacular a win would that have been? Or could it have even been, with any stretch of the imagination? :yep
     
  8. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Nah.
     
  9. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    from what i have read every Robinson vs Lamotta fight was very very close with almost every fight causing a debate over who won.

    Now Robinson despite a close 10 rounds dominated Lamotta so i think this one of the vest wins in history.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,939
    47,974
    Mar 21, 2007
    LaMotta is one of the greatest 20 in history in his division.

    For a welterweight to beat him is pretty crazy. Given LaMotta's style...probably amongst the most underated wins in history.
     
  11. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    153
    Mar 4, 2009
    I rate it as a win at middleweight but it gives you an idea of how great Robinson was as a welterweight to beat top middleweights like LaMotta without weighing more than 147 pounds.

    At MW those wins should rate extremely highly as well since Jake was a great fighter, atleast in my view. I think of LaMotta very highly, as a boxer that is, not as a person.

    Here's a compilation I made of LaMotta's fights:

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBz1gXQ3ZUY[/ame]


    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lp49ew3Uadg[/ame]


    Unfortunately the majority of the footage is LaMotta into his 30's. Robinson said LaMotta had slowed down a lot by the time they fought a sixth time.
     
  12. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    yout the guy taht got me to appreciate this victory and fight
     
  13. SLAKKA

    SLAKKA Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,829
    25
    Jun 4, 2009
    That is so not true. What are your sources?
     
  14. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    Alan S Rosenfeld mentions it in his book about Burley as he attended afew of them
     
  15. SLAKKA

    SLAKKA Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,829
    25
    Jun 4, 2009
    I've spoken to Allen many times and he mentions me in his book.

    This may pertain to the encounter after Jakes undisputed win but no other.