Where does David Haye rank in Wladimir Klitschkos list of opponents? Is he the best?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Beatboxer, Jun 29, 2011.


  1. Beatboxer

    Beatboxer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,937
    2
    Mar 4, 2006
    Wladimir Klitschko is the number 1 ranked HW in the World today holding two of the 4 main Titles (WBO and the IBF) in addition to the highly regarded Ring Magazine Title.

    He has a record of 55 victories (49 stoppages) with 3 defeats.

    In my humble opinion, his greatest victories are as follows:

    1. Ruslan Chagaev - Undefeated WBA Champion
    2. Sam Peter (1st fight) - Hard punching, undefeated contender
    3. Chris Byrd (2nd fight) - Slippery IBF Champion
    4. Sultan Ibragimov - Undefeated WBO Champion
    5. Lamon Brewster - Avenged defeat.

    He has also beaten the likes of capable top 10 fighters such as Tony Thompson, Eddie Chambers, Montee Barrett and Calvin Brock as well as past prime former belt holders such as Franz Botha and Ray Mercer as well as shot ex Champion Hasim Rahman.

    He was beaten by the dangerous Corrie Sanders and journeyman pro Ross Puritty early in his career.

    Now, I like Wladimir. I admire him greatly. What's not to like? A true gentleman, well educated, speaks multiple languages and I admire the manner in which he rebuilt his career after the crushing defeats against Sanders and Brewster within a short time of one another. He is clearly the stand out HW of this weak generation (and I include his brother in that) and has done remarkably well to the point he's knocking the door to the top 20 HWs ever in my opinion.

    However, looking at his competition, I believe he's rarely faced an opponent as dangerous as David Haye who for all his bluster, does have genuinely brillant gifts in terms of his power and speed. He's also shown great heart when knocked down in the past, coming off the canvas in a foreign land to become thee Crusierweight Champion against a good fighter in Mormeck. He's also demonstrated the ability to plan and execute a perfect strategy against the awkward Nicoaly Valuev and has show us his speed and power in the Ruiz fight.

    Now with all that in mind, where would you place Haye in terms of Wladimir's opponents? I actually think Haye's record at HW is pretty decent (Valuev, Barrett and Ruiz) considering how **** poor the division is these days and his CW work should not be completely ignored. He also clearly has certain tools that can worry Wladmir, and is a belt holder regardless of what we think of the WBA.

    I think there is an argument there for David Haye being the best fighter Wladimir has ever faced and certainly the most dangerous since Peter the first time, or even Sanders.

    What do you think? Where would you rank David Haye in this respect?

    Your thoughts would be appreciated.
     
  2. fg2227

    fg2227 Guest

    Haye is easily the most dangerous fighter he has faced.
     
  3. bratwurzt

    bratwurzt Whore Full Member

    3,816
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    Prob better to revisit this on Sunday morning.
     
  4. Del Boy

    Del Boy R.I.P Darren Sutherland Full Member

    2,860
    109
    Nov 13, 2009
    I honestly dont think Haye is better then Eddie Chambers
     
  5. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    IMO, the Chagaev win isn't all that great. If you look at him in his previous couple of fights (Drummond and Skelton) then you could that he'd faded a fair bit. Since he took time out for his illness he hadn't looked all that great and, in hindsight, after the Wlad fight he's struggled to impress as well.

    Both the Chambers and Thompson wins are much better for me.
     
  6. Jonsey

    Jonsey Boxing Junkie banned

    11,130
    0
    May 17, 2011
    I think Haye is the best opponent. Really you must be slightly ******ed to think Chambers is better than Haye.
     
  7. mugen82

    mugen82 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,483
    0
    May 1, 2009
    Chambers is a waste of space, he's the sort of fighter who'd not even have won the NABC heavyweight title a few years previously.

    Both him and Byrd had pillow for fists, so can in no way be compared to Haye, despite their so called speed. Its one thing having speed to land pitter patter, another to land someting which will kill braincells.
     
  8. Macky

    Macky Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,486
    0
    Feb 10, 2011
    Wladimir has already said this is the biggest fight of his career

    Haye is without doubt the best hes been in with
     
  9. jpab19

    jpab19 Exploding Muffin Dad Full Member

    15,720
    5
    Jul 8, 2010
    I think you overrate Peter a tad. I don't really onsider him to be a superior victory than the Byrd one, I actually think a strong case can be made for Chambers being a better win too.

    What I will say is, of all the men Wlad has beaten, none of them can take advantage of his weaknesses better than Haye. Whatever about your opinion on if the likes of Chagaev, Byrd and Ibragimov are/were better, it's inarguable that Haye is best suited to highlight Wlad's shortcomings. If you look at the vast majority of victories you listed, a lot of them fighters are boxer-types, and are essentially tailor-made for a tall, imposing fighter like Klitschko, who can effectively use his range, his jab and his weight to full advantage.

    Haye offers that brand of quickness and explosiveness to make this interesting. And that's why I think he's got a better shot than most. Byrd and Chambers were quick, but they were lacking in power. Peter is a pretty hard puncher(evident by the fact he dropped Wlad), but he lacks any kind of speed and he's very predictable for the most part. Unlike Peter, you're not guaranteed to see where Haye's shots are coming from, and that could be key. Wlad, as good as his jab is, often leaves his left hand outstretched, and if there's anybody who's able to take him out with a right hand over it, then Haye's a decent candidate.

    As for if he's better than the other guys, I'm not sure. I, personally, ain't all that impressed from his body of work at heavy thus far. Barrett was never particularly special, and he was in all liklihood past his best. I think it's acceptable to score their fight to Valuev if I'm honest, there's a lot of smoke and mirrors regarding Haye's performance. Ruiz was past his best and he probably should've been taken out earlier than he was. And I don't think I need to go into the Harrison debacle.

    I suppose, for me, everything will be answered only when they fight.
     
  10. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Chambers was better, Byrd was better.
    Even a "faded" Chagaev was probably better.

    But Haye is a more dangerous puncher than those guys.
    Also, he's far less durable than them.
     
  11. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    Is this a debate? You have to be mildly ******ed to believe any of them victories were over more dangerous opponents than David Haye.

    Even Brewster who is the most dangerous, it was 3 years later and he'd lost to Liakovich.
     
  12. Beatboxer

    Beatboxer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,937
    2
    Mar 4, 2006
    JPAB,

    Interesting post. Thanks for taking the time to write such a well thought out reply. What I'd say about the Peter win is consider the place Wladimir was in at the time: he had been stopped twice in the past couple of years. Touch of Sleep had knocked him down. He didn't look all that confident a fighter going into a fight that some were saying was make or break for his career against an undefeated puncher whom some were speculating was the future of the HW division. He was an underdog.

    But he won and he did so by overcoming adversity. That's why I rate the first fight so highly, and didn't mention their 2nd encounter, by which time Peter's drawbacks had been well and truely exposed and Wladimir's confidence restored, his style set.

    I just don't think Chambers or Byrd (though I probably rate them as better fighters than Peter) had the qualities to present Wladimir with any trouble, owing to their relative lack of punch power.

    I agree with your assessment of what Haye has to offer in terms of explosive power. I think that quality could well win this fight as Wladimir has not been tested by that combination of speed and power since the Sanders fight.

    I think you're a little harsh on Hayes resume: I thought he should've won by a wide score against the cumbersome Valuev and whilst Ruiz was past his best, many have struggled badly against him. In fact, only Tua beat him more convincingly than did Haye in my mind, including Jones who outboxed him soundly but of course, didn't beat him up and stop him in the manner that Haye did.

    Haye has the qualities to frighten Wladimir in there again. He's alot more experienced since the days of stumbling around like a drunkard against Sanders, but he's not been tested in that manner since.

    I think Haye is Wlad's most dangerous opponent, certainly. I will be very impressed if Wladimir dominates and stops him, very impressed indeed.
     
  13. Beatboxer

    Beatboxer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,937
    2
    Mar 4, 2006
    I think it's a reasonable topic to raise TFFP and theres a reason I did so in this forum. I look at the discussions over at the general, and a common way to disparage Haye is to assert the view that's he isn't Wladimir's best opponent.

    I think that's poppycock personally, and wanted to see the views of people who know what they're talking about over here at the British.

    Haye to me, is a very dangerous opponent for Wladimir indeed and poses the sort of problems that Klitschko hasn't faced since Sanders.
     
  14. FrochFan7

    FrochFan7 Expert In Stucco Full Member

    1,426
    0
    Jun 4, 2011
    You have to say Haye is the best from what we know now.

    Haye's problem though is he doesn't really have the experience or many impressive victories to back it up. To get a shot at the title, at heavyweight he's only really been tested against Valuev and Ruiz. Ruslan Chagaev had the same. That's not to say that Chagaev is better than Haye because he's not but if Haye gets battered on Saturday night, 90% of people will believe that Haye as a threat was purely hype.

    But you've got to be fair and Haye definitely represents the biggest challenge to Wlad's dominance over the last 3 years.
     
  15. Dunky McCafferty

    Dunky McCafferty Boxing Junkie banned

    10,067
    2
    Aug 24, 2004
    My thoughts exactly.