Where does Graziano rate all time at middleweight?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Aug 14, 2018.


  1. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    I don't think, though, that a fighter who has three impressive KO's of welter champions is "massively" lacking in credentials.

    Who actually was the #1 contender in September, 1946 when Graziano fought Zale? Where was Graziano in fact rated? I think very highly, perhaps even at #1.

    Graziano was a "tweener" not really a full scale middle but not able to make welter. But if he had been able, or was made to, dry out to 147, would his credentials be any less than other guys who jumped up in class to challenge a champion. What heavyweights had Michael Spinks beaten when challenging Holmes? What light-heavies had D-ck Tiger beaten when challenging Torres?

    This is a case of calling a man unqualified to fight for the title who is certainly highly rated and ends up winning the title.
     
  2. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Very good post, maybe your best.

    Cerdan was a tank with power and skills.

    Agreed LaMotta is " over puffed. "

    Also agree that

    Grazino beat Zale in the middle fight of the trilogy when he was aging ( Zale 34 ), a puncher's chance if you will was cashed in, however Zale KO'd Grazino first and last in the trilogy.
     
  3. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Graziano never beat a top 10 rated middleweight yet got 3 title shots at middleweight

    This is unprecedented in boxing history


    For a man who values RING ratings very highly, I’m shocked you are so quick to Grazianos defense.

    “3 welterweight champs”

    Who were vastly inferior to the 160lb men who were rated above graziano whom graziano did not fight

    In an era filled with hall of fame middleweights like Williams Burley Lamotta and Cerdan...Graziano instead fought men in a different weight class instead of proving his worth vs the best contenders in his own weight class. He admitted to doing so in fear of getting eliminated from a title shot

    Speaking of the welterweights, how did they do at middle?

    Servo- never fought anyone at 160 besides graziano

    Cochrane - never fought anyone at 160 besides graziano

    Davis- never fought anyone at 160 besides graziano
     
  4. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Cerdan was a tank and lamotta wasn’t? Lamotta threw cerdan around like a ragdolll in that first round. Lamotta on films looked like the stronger man

    Lamotta also defeated 15 men who at one time another were RING top 10 at 160. Cerdans resume doesn’t stack up

    I think Edwards top 6 is very weak leaving out some big names at 160 who belong over Graziano like Marshall Booker Charles and Moore. And I personally cannot see Zale being above Burley or Williams. His resume is too thin.
     
  5. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    Green beat Giardello. Hudson beat LaMotta. Brimm beat Williams and drew with Robinson. But on the whole I agree with you.

    "Graziano never beat a top ten middleweight"

    You mean Tony Zale was never a top ten middleweight?
     
  6. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    "Marshall, Booker, Charles, and Moore"

    All fighters who peaked at light-heavy.

    "I cannot see Zale being above Burley or Williams"

    Fair enough. But I wonder why Burley is usually rated above Williams, who seems to have done more and was generally above Burley in the 1940's ratings.

    "LaMotta threw Cerdan around like a rag doll"

    Perhaps Cerdan wasn't expecting a wrestling move. It was after all a boxing match.

    "Cerdan's resume doesn't stack up"

    Two things, six years of Cerdan's prime were during WWII. Second, the ratings are totally American centered so I wouldn't give them the credence when comparing a Yank to an old-world or South American fighter you do. Plus a lot of LaMotta's resume is during the war-depleted WWII years. After the war he was 29-9-2, a good but not outstanding record for a champion. And he wasn't old.

    Cerdan was better than everyone he fought up to LaMotta at age 33 when injured in the first round by a wrestling move.

    Your case is strong against Graziano and to an extent Zale, but I don't think you have a good case against Cerdan.

    Cerdan wasn't in and out like LaMotta. When the two fought, Cerdan was a 2-1 favorite despite being six years older and probably slipping.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,075
    Jun 2, 2006
    QUOTE="edward morbius, post: 19350683, member: 74270"]I don't think, though, that a fighter who has three impressive KO's of welter champions is "massively" lacking in credentials.

    Who actually was the #1 contender in September, 1946 when Graziano fought Zale? Where was Graziano in fact rated? I think very highly, perhaps even at #1.

    Graziano was a "tweener" not really a full scale middle but not able to make welter. But if he had been able, or was made to, dry out to 147, would his credentials be any less than other guys who jumped up in class to challenge a champion. What heavyweights had Michael Spinks beaten when challenging Holmes? What light-heavies had D-ck Tiger beaten when challenging Torres?

    This is a case of calling a man unqualified to fight for the title who is certainly highly rated and ends up winning the title.[/QUOTE]
    Spinks was an undefeated Lhvy Champ, Tiger was a highly respected middleweight champ, both among the best all time in their respective divisions.
    By contrast Graziano was an exciting, but crude street brawler who had been carefully matched and had held no titles ,unless you want to include Champion of Leavenworth.
    It's blindingly obvious why Zale's team chose to leap frog him over Lamotta and Burley ,most money least risk or so they thought ,and they were right two out of three times.
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2018
  8. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Before the shoulder injury, cerdan was staggered badly by lamotta and was getting battered around the ring by punches...this can be verified in fight reports and on film

    Small sample size...but lamotta was off to a really good start against cerdan and may have just had his number


    Fair point about the war with cerdan....

    “American centered”

    Yet he never took on the best of Europe

    Then how come cerdan never fought the bets middleweight of his own country in Robert Villemain? Would have been a real test for Marcel

    And what about Laurent Dauthuille? No fight against him?

    Also he split with Cyrille Dellanoit

    Lastly why not fight tiberio Mitri? He knocked out Turpin in 1 round. Lamotta beat him in a title defense

    “All fighters who peaked at light H”

    Yes but they were still excellent middleweights..maybe not as much in the case of Moore but the rest for sure

    Charles beat Charley Burley TWICE, and knocked out Jose Basora and Steve Mamakos at 160

    Marshall beat middleweight champions Yarosz, Brouillard and Overlin, Risko, and Lamotta...that’s 5 word champions at 160. He also beat Charley Burley.

    Marshall’s resume at 160 is eye popping

    Booker beat Matthews, Moore, Williams, Chase and Marshall at 160

    Moore beat Richards (beat lesnevich) and chase at 160. I agree Moore’s resume is lacking at 160


    “Wrestling move”

    Seems more of a half punch/push

    Judge for yourself

    This content is protected

    50 second mark

    From Steve Compton

    The one interview I did which really stands out was with Alan Rosenfeld who wrote the book on Burley. Rosenfeld was ringside that night. He said that prior to the bout LaMotta was not given much of a chance by insiders who felt he was rapidly fading (which I partly agree with). He said LaMotta entered the ring with his leopard skin robe and when he took the robe off he looked like he was carved from stone. He said it electrified the crowd who now expected Cerdan to have a fight on his hands and that the audience all went "ooooh" in unison as the robe came off (they had not expected him to be in that great of condition). He stated that much has been made of Cerdan's shoulder injury but that what is rarely mentioned is that LaMotta was beating the hell out of Cerdan before the injury and that he was literally lifting him off the canvas with bodyshots (which was LaMottas specialty). He stated that he wasnt convinced by Cerdan's injury and even added that from his vantage point it looked like a half punch half push that sent Cerdan as opposed to the now accepted story that LaMotta wrestled him to the canvas. He closed by saying that he didnt think Cerdan would have beaten LaMotta that night with or without the injury.

    Another guy I interviewed was Leon Thompson. He was an old fighter who fought out of Chicago and served as Zales sparring partner. He had sparred with Cerdan for the media prior to Cerdans bout with Zale, Anton Raadik, Jackie Conn, and several others. Decent club fighter. Anyway he didnt have much to add as we spoke more about Zale but he basically backed up what Rosenfeld said. He said he really liked Cerdan and that he was a nice guy (though he couldnt speak much english) but added that he didnt think Cerdan or Zale could have beaten LaMotta. I was surprised to hear him say that about Zale because he was really fond of Tony and kept in touch with him until Tony died. He was even kind of managed or at least helped a bit by Art Winch and Sam Piam (Zales handlers).

    The Rosenfeld interview was from around 2004 maybe. The Thompson interview was around 1999 or 2000
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2018
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,075
    Jun 2, 2006
    Ron Richards would have given Graziano all the fight he wanted.
     
    SuzieQ49 likes this.
  10. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Cerdan was a tank with Power. Jake was a Tank without power in his mitts. Jake's win over Cerdan should be a No Contest do to the throw down foul. It was Cerdan's lone stoppage loss in 100+ fights.

    Cerdan's resume was halted when he died in transit to re-match LaMotta, but he did beat H Williams, T Zale, G Abrams...three hall of fame guys plus Turpin and Green. So he beat many types of styles. On film he grows on you a high guard pressure fighter, with power a good chin, good speed, and good defense.

    Graziano was one of those colorful, but flawed punchers who cashed in on a puncher's chance. The Arturo Gatti of his times if you will. Or maybe the Bob Satterfield of his times. Always like watching those types
     
    edward morbius likes this.
  11. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    He fought a 35 year old Zale, and Abrams coming off a 4 year layoff.

    He fought a 31 year old Williams in cerdans hometown and the AP scored it Even.

    He avoided the best fighters in Europe Villemain Mitri and Dauthille.
    Its debateable at best that Cerdan was better than Villemain or Dauthille as both of them fought better opposition at that weight and never got a crack at Cerdan which they would have accepted in a heart beat.

    What great fighters near their prime did cerdan ever beat?


    Lamotta Cerdan definitely should not be a no contest...cerdan tried to clinch Lamotta because Lamotta hurt cerdan very badly with a left hook and was pummeling him in the corner...
    So cerdan clinched him and he happened to go to the ground from a half push/punch

    See for yourself Lamotta had badly hurt cerdan and was pounding on him

    0:42-54 seconds

    This content is protected


    Doesn’t look like Lamotta did anything dirty here...cerdan happens to fall from a half push/punch while he was trying to clinch to prevent Lamotta from beating on him some more


    From Steve Compton

    The one interview I did which really stands out was with Alan Rosenfeld who wrote the book on Burley. Rosenfeld was ringside that night. He said that prior to the bout LaMotta was not given much of a chance by insiders who felt he was rapidly fading (which I partly agree with). He said LaMotta entered the ring with his leopard skin robe and when he took the robe off he looked like he was carved from stone. He said it electrified the crowd who now expected Cerdan to have a fight on his hands and that the audience all went "ooooh" in unison as the robe came off (they had not expected him to be in that great of condition). He stated that much has been made of Cerdan's shoulder injury but that what is rarely mentioned is that LaMotta was beating the hell out of Cerdan before the injury and that he was literally lifting him off the canvas with bodyshots (which was LaMottas specialty). He stated that he wasnt convinced by Cerdan's injury and even added that from his vantage point it looked like a half punch half push that sent Cerdan as opposed to the now accepted story that LaMotta wrestled him to the canvas. He closed by saying that he didnt think Cerdan would have beaten LaMotta that night with or without the injury.

    Another guy I interviewed was Leon Thompson. He was an old fighter who fought out of Chicago and served as Zales sparring partner. He had sparred with Cerdan for the media prior to Cerdans bout with Zale, Anton Raadik, Jackie Conn, and several others. Decent club fighter. Anyway he didnt have much to add as we spoke more about Zale but he basically backed up what Rosenfeld said. He said he really liked Cerdan and that he was a nice guy (though he couldnt speak much english) but added that he didnt think Cerdan or Zale could have beaten LaMotta. I was surprised to hear him say that about Zale because he was really fond of Tony and kept in touch with him until Tony died. He was even kind of managed or at least helped a bit by Art Winch and Sam Piam (Zales handlers).

    The Rosenfeld interview was from around 2004 maybe. The Thompson interview was around 1999 or 2000
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2018
  12. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Let me know what Zale bio says regarding Burley Williams And Lamotta
     
  13. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Interesting how much you defend cerdan over Lamotta

    You say ratings were “American centered”

    Yet Lamotta fought and beat the 4 best European middleweights Mitri, Dauthille, Villemain, and Cerdan.

    How did cerdan do against the best of Europe? He never fought Villemain, dauthille, or Mitri despite all three challenging cerdan. He fought Delannoit and split 1-1 with him

    Clear edge for Lamotta
     
    mcvey likes this.
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,075
    Jun 2, 2006
    This is really unarguable.
     
  15. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    These were not the best men in Europe for most of Cerdan's career, and don't seem to have been as good as Charles Humez, who came a bit later.

    Laurent Dauthuille (born 2-24-1924)
    Was actually a mediocre Euro who made his rep beating LaMotta and proving himself more or less LaMotta's equal in 1949 and 1950.
    Cyrille Delannoit--beat Dauthuille on 1-24 and 2-28, 1948.
    Robert Villemain--beat Dauthuille in 1947 and 1948
    Tiberio Mitri--beat Dauthuille on 10-22-1948
    Giavanni Manca--drew with Dauthuille 6-22-1947
    Jean Stock--drew with Dauthuille 9-11-1948
    So a trial horse in Europe, but on 2-21-1949, beats Jake LaMotta by UD. Loses to Gavilan, but keeps winning, including a win over the aging Steve Belloise before getting a title shot with Jake and almost winning it. Does fight a drew with Villemain in 1951, but loses to Charles Humez, who seems to have been better than all this group.

    Robert Villemain (born 1-10-1924)
    Was not fighting Cerdan because he was campaigning at welter. Has a listed weight of 146 lbs. on 12/4/1946. Still was listed at only 150 lbs. on 4/20/1948 when the 32 year old Cerdan was going for the world title. Villemain drew with Mark Hart on 5/31/1948, so little evidence he was more than a promising Euro comer through 1948.
    Steve Belloise--beat Villemain by a one-sided UD on 1-7-1949
    Jake LaMotta--"wins" SD against Villemain on 3/25/1949. I will post separately on this. Villemain I think proved himself SUPERIOR to LaMotta.
    Dave Sands--beats Villemain on 7/5/1949, knocking him down a couple of times.
    Jake LaMotta--Villemain wins wide UD over LaMotta on 12/9/1949. LaMotta ducks both Villemain and Sands.
    Villemain is a good fighter, beating Gavilan, but losing twice to Robinson and after that proves a solid but not outstanding middle.

    Tiberio Mitri (born 7/12/1926)
    Draws in 1947 with Giovanni Manca and Antoine Toniolo. Is not really that outstanding while Cerdan is in Europe. First big win over trial horse Laurent Dauthuille on 10-22-1948, when Cerdan is already world champion. Wins European title from Delannoit on 5/7/1949 just before the Cerdan-LaMotta fight. Doesn't beat anyone of particular note until he loses to LaMotta on 7/12/1950. More or less ordinary after that except for the out of the nowhere (Mitri doesn't seem to have been much of a puncher) one round KO of Randy Turpin in 1954. Was beaten twice by Charles Humez, who seems to have been the best post-Cerdan Euro middle.

    Cyrille Delannoit (born 3/13/1926)
    Lost to Villemain as a welter in 1946 when 20. Got to a Euro title fight with wins over Dauthuille (2), Kid Tunero, Robert Charron, and Antoine Toniolo. I guess if you're going after Cerdan you have to play this loss for all it is worth. According to boxrec, Cerdan was having back trouble and didn't train as hard as usual, but every loser has an excuse. No doubt though that Cerdan was 32 and probably slipping. Cerdan knocked Delannoit down four times in the rematch and won decisively to earn his shot at Zale.

    Bottom line, the Cerdan fight aside, LaMotta seems to have been at about the level of these Euros. He fought Dauthuille, who seems ordinary overall, on even terms. He beat Mitri. He somehow got a split with Villemain. But Charles Humez actually did better than LaMotta with common foes.

    As for Cerdan against Villemain, Mitri, and Dauthuille, this criticism is jumping to a conclusion from a total lack of evidence. Cerdan was simply an older man whose career was winding down before these men appeared on the scene.
     
    Last edited: Aug 17, 2018
    Mendoza likes this.