what you qouted says "two very close and riveting fights". you must've jumped to the wrong assumption again to interpret this as two victories lol
Go re-read you own post......you indirectly insinuated that Pac got his ass beat because he was drained!:|
Divac, your comprehension is really going downhill!!!! The guy stated that JMM's career is based on two close fights with Pac, you jumped to another conclusion ---- admission that Pac lost. Are you applying the same reasoning again when Roach admitted that the fight was close, therefore Pac lost?????? Because to you, JMM won so convincingly that even if you made several or few mistakes in your assessment, JMM still won!
divac is hoping for this version of pac This content is protected too bad even a severely drained version of pac, jmm's ass still went up the roof :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
your comprehension and ability to logically jump to conclusions is very poor lol. you interpret what you read according to your bias or agenda. what's worse is that you are one of the posters in ESb who have great tendencies to get ahead of the facts and make generalizations based on assumptions alone.:verysad:verysad
The logical conclusion that you actually can get is that it was a close fight because Pac was weight drained! Your conclusion is a trademark Divac, always jumping to a wrong conclusion.