Where Does Sonny Liston Rank As An ATG Heavyweight?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by PetethePrince, Jun 21, 2009.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,114
    Mar 21, 2007
    Langford quit against Fred Fulton, but no, I wasn't talking about quiting - I believe the phrase you used was "giving their best in the ring"? I thought that's what they were talking about. You could argue that Johnson and Langford did their best against who they decided to fight (in Johnson's case) and inspite of the fact that they were not training properly (in Langford's case) but I don't know that that would be entirely correct. The point would be that there were more "give" in the men overall rather than had directly quit in the ring.





    You mean, "why didn't Liston fight other top contenders after Ali"? Liston was something of a person non grata as far as the governing bodies and top promoters. He's still probably the only defeated champion who was stripped of his liscence for losing...it was extremely difficult to get fights, he had no manager of note (And nobody looking to touch him with the The Grey's people hovering). When he was re-liscenced to fight in the US he was obviously very easy to duck.

    I know nothing about Ring rankings etc., but I do know that Clarke was supposed to be an eliminator for an eliminator and I have footage (might be on yoututbe) of him discussing his coming title run in the ring right after the fight. I think he was being lined up to fight Quarry, Sonny said, "that boy...i've forgotten his name [is reminded]...Jerry Quarry said he would fight me." "Well, if you win that one Sonny you're right back in the title race"

    Fight never materialised. I suppose your position will be that Sonny may have ducked Jerry, but that doesn't seem likely to me. However, I have no proof and so will accept the theoretical possibility in advance.

    But I do insist that Sonny had terrible trouble making fights, little in the way of representation, was certainly collecting pay from promoters in person, and was the easiest fighter in the world to duck.
     
  2. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    That's an odd view considering how much flack you hold against Vitali for quitting because of a torn rotator cuff.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,122
    Jun 2, 2006
    When I rank Liston I think of the guy that walked through the bombs of Cleveland Williams twice,not the old boozer that was loaded down with ring rust and inactivity against Ali.
     
  4. Sonny Carson

    Sonny Carson Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,995
    5
    Jan 7, 2007
    I agree and I don't hold it against anybody for losing to Muhammad Ali.
     
  5. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    But he was even more highly regarded going into the Ali fight than at the time of the Williams fights. It's completely contradictory (and revisionist) to put the Liston that fought Williams on a pedestal, but then make speculative excuses for him at the time he fought Ali.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,114
    Mar 21, 2007

    What's wrong with revisionism? Your point seems to be that because Liston was seen as unbeateable before the Ali fight we should hold that as true - even though he was immediatly beaten.
     
  7. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    It's funny that people keep saying the Patterson fights don't show enough to prove that Liston was still in his prime. But just the same way, no one here has anything to prove he was past his prime then either. It's purely a revisionist assumption, made only after his failure to live up to a certain image/expectation of him.
     
  8. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    Everything. It distorts history.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,114
    Mar 21, 2007

    There's the perception of the press at the time, but that can be incorrect.

    For example, biographers seem satisfied of Sonny's drinking at this time. It seems to have been a secret, or mostly secret, to the press.

    The press have Sonny as unbeateable before the Ali fight. Ali beat him.

    So we can embark on revisionism based upon the concrete facts or our nearest perception of them.
     
  10. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    I don't know; but when it has happened, how many champions simply give up when that happens to them? Even worse, how many champions don't even make an effort to avenge the loss or get their title back when they're fortunate enough to get that golden opportunity?

    Liston had his chance to prove his behavior in the first fight was a "fluke."
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,114
    Mar 21, 2007

    We have his filmed performance against Ali shortly after the Patterson fight, some fights after the Ali fight where he fails to live up to the standards he set before the Patterson fights, his inactivity leading up to the Ali fight, his age, some sources which you are free to investigate which have Liston returning to the bottle and less dedicated in training after Patterson I, perhaps returning to serious training for Ali II.
     
  12. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,687
    46,335
    Feb 11, 2005
    Cleveland Williams was a decidedly mediocre fighter. Very little props for KO'ing that fellow.
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,122
    Jun 2, 2006
    Williams was one of the biggest punchers of all time ,Liston walked through those punches twice to score 2 kos,that was prime Liston imo.
    Im sorry, but I have trouble taking most of your posts seriously.
    I dont know if you enjoy playing devil's advocate ,or really beleive half of what you post ,either way, a response from me feels wasted.
     
  14. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    They gave their best. And in Langford's case, the title was not on the line. Under those circumstances, i think quitting is more forgivable because one can make the calculated decision of taking a loss to be able to regain form and perhaps move back in the title picture, instead of being valiant in defeat and never being able to reach the same level again.

    Bottomline, neither quit as blatantly and neither did so twice.




    Regardless, Clark was a border-line type of guy who cracked the low end of the top10 once or twice but lost most of his big ones. He even managed to draw with an ancient Brian London and lost to plenty of no hopers. Credit to Liston for beating him, but he lost badly to Martin a year or so later. A 1-1 record is hardly indicative of still being at the top of the mountain.

    As for him not being able to get fights, that is his own fault. No promoter in his right mind is going to risk getting a guy who can lay down during any second of a fight on his card.



    It's not the fact that he lost twice to Clay, it's the easy manner in which he gave up. Twice. Even guys like Mildenberger, Cooper, Jones, old Folley and Chuvalo gave Ali a harder fight.


    Okay, so he was a border line top10 guy.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,114
    Mar 21, 2007
    I didn't say, at any point that they did. In the original point which we were discussing, you didn't say anythign about quitting either.






    Well he boxed very well against Clarke, showed excellent generalship, but looked a good deal slower. Liston certainly wasn't at the top of the mountain when he fought Clarke or Martin, and I didn't say at any point that he was. You were the one trying to say Liston was close to the top of his game later in his career (Ali I), I was the one saying he was already past his best, this 1-1 against ranked contenders in his final 20 months as a pro seems like something that was bound to happen in my eyes.

    You seem to be inferring I have said things that I haven't or have adopted positions that I haven't.

    I didn't say at any point that it was anyone elses fault; you seemed to be asking me why he didn't match top contenders after Ali and I offered you an explanation which you seem to have accepted. Liston's path may have been marked out for him, is all I would say about this point of blame.

    Just as an aside, you yourself have suggested the ko may have been legit on this board, and the dive was certainly never proven.




    Or just "top 10" if you prefer.