Where is Golovkin?

where is your proof of corruption? it sounds to me like you're just saying "it's corruption" because the guy you were rooting for didn't win.

 

Prove corruption in boxing? I am not saying it is not there, but prove it and then overturn a decision. Whenever someone files a complaint, you know the decision will never be overturned. It is ironclad. Bad decisions are one thing, but usually respectable judges make them. And they make them under pressure and big fights.

 

Judges are filthy, biased and corrupt, you have to take this in to account when evaluating a fighter and his abilities.

 

You have to have proof. Saying that was a bad decision means nothing. There have been many. And those decisions stand. Hagler always said after the Vito fight, I am going to let these speak for me. This is K and this is O. Meaning his fists were KO. so he would not go to the distance.

 

It doesn't take judges for you to see that Canelo out performed Golovkin and got the better of Golovkin on two different occasions. Canelo is cleraly more skilled, more explosive, with better defense, etc. He's a better boxer than Golovkin (he proved that in the first fight) and he's a better fighter than Golovkin (he proved that in the rematch). Golovkin kept both fights close, close enough for his fanboys to act like he won (all the while using the age excuse) because it makes them feel better, but that doesn't change what happened and who beat who. Canelo beat GGG plain and simple, and the vast majority do not believe there was any robbery. Canelo outworked GGG in the rematch, he did the things that great fighters do to win.

 

A **** poor decision is proof of corruption, when everybody including the blind man next door thinks the decision was horrid, this means it is corrupt. You cant file a complaint with the corrupt boxing establishment against the corrupt Judges, LOL. But you like to follow the herd, good on you.

 

I love the sport. I cannot say file complaints and claim corruption everytime the fighter I like does not win, or I think it was a bad decision. The guys who make these bad decisions are respectable judges. The sport has to be able to function, and if you put too much complaining into something claiming corruption, then the sport will not exist. It will get bogged down in corruption claims and complaints, and everytime a fighter loses he will claim corruption. There has to be a standard. The fight was really GGG's to win by knockout. He was the knockout puncher fighting a smaller guy and he could not stop him two times. Regardless of the decision, he was the knockout puncher who could not knock out Canelo. It was on him to prove he was the stronger guy who could wipe out Canelo like he did the other guys.

 

That is simply not true. The vast majority do not consider the rematch in any way a robbery. More fans thought Canelo won the rematch than in the first fight, and even those that had GGG winning by and large did not have him winning clearly.

What is there to complain about ? In the first fight you had an outlier judge and complaints were definitely filed, by Team GGG, through complaining GGG got to hand pick the referees in the rematch. Even Sanchez said after the bout that he can't complain about the judges when he pretty much apointed them himself. In the rematch, those were judges that YOUR GUY apointed lol and not only that but they all had very similar scores and rounds. If there was any corruption in the rematch, it was that Sanchez was able to apoint judges he wanted, and GGG's judges still had Canelo winning lmao.

 

He is sitting down disgusted at the treatment he recieved and how he got robbed twice

 

LMAO. Canelo may not be taller than GGG, but he definitely is thicker, just stop with this 'smaller' BS you agenda driven shill. The decision becomes corrupt if everybody, including respectable sources claim it was a robbery, it isnt just me, I guess its okay to forget that Golovkin was seen as the victor for his two fights against Canelo right?

 

'smaller' BS agenda ? lol have you ever heard of weight classes . When Canelo was fighting at 147 and 154, GGG was fighting at Middleweight. You do the math, Canelo is clearly the much smaller guy who moved up to Middleweight from super welter / jr middle / welter.

 

They don't like to admit a smaller man beat up the reigning MW King.

 

What weight was Canelo's fight at and what weight did he weigh in prior to the first GGG fight?

 

Canelo never fought above 155 except for the farce of a fight against JCCjr.

Canelo was not acclimated to 160, had never fought a legit 160, had never punched a legit 160, had never been punched by a legit 160.

12 months before fighting Golovkin, Canelo fought at 154, and beat the dog s*** out of Liam Smith, no issues at all.

I hope you guys know that being cut up doesn't mean bigger.

 

You are new to boxing I can tell. That always happens to "punchers" you put a great fighter with skills and they look average