Where is the evidence. Show me proof that Pac is taking drugs now!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Farmboxer, Dec 27, 2009.


  1. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,440
    11,475
    Jan 6, 2007
    So where does the analogy break down then, genius ?

    If you don't let your paranoid neighbour search your garage, does this prove you have something to hide ?

    Apparently it DOES. That's what the whole ****in' thing is about.

    The Mayweathers believe that Pac is using.

    Floyd senior has said so.

    I never said anywhere that I did.

    I did say, correctly, that he has stated without providing a shred of evidence, that Pac is using drugs.

    Well clearly NOT.

    If "he would want to clear his name" he would have done so.

    He doesn't have to clear his name because no one has produced any evidence that he's done anything wrong.



    Back to the analogy I gave you.

    Would you want to let the ***** search your garage just to 'prove him wrong?'

    The proper thing for him to do would be to call the cops and let them check the garage. IT'S THEIR JOB.


    The proper thing for FLOYD to do would be to have the Nevada State Athletic Commission check Floyd for drugs. IT'S THEI JOB.
     
  2. Powerman55

    Powerman55 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,295
    0
    Nov 26, 2008
    A simple test? Have you not read any of the stories. He's just not agreeing to being tested MANY times at random moments.

    Has any other boxer in the history of boxing been subjected to this? NO. Pacquaio should not be singled out, if he has to have this test the so should every other boxer. Mosely, Hopkins etc.
     
  3. josak

    josak Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,018
    16
    Jan 4, 2007
    Actually it's not a dumb analogy, it makes perfect sense. Why should Manny Pacquiao have to take some ridiculous tests because some idiot made an accusation about him?

    Manny wants use the standard testing procedures that are in place. Apparently they were good enough for Floyd in his 40 other bouts, why not this one?

    Didn't he say Pacquiao would be an easier fight then Marquez? The truth is this is a typical Floyd move. The guy is big wet *****. If he had any balls at all he would have never made this request and the fight would be signed now.
     
  4. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    7,856
    0
    Mar 8, 2008
    why is it hard for the *****s to understand this? ^^^
     
  5. See Me Flow

    See Me Flow The Pharaoh of Boxing Full Member

    6,482
    2
    Jul 20, 2004
    It is a poor analogy. And what's ridiculous about world renowned drug testing procedures? What's is ridiculous is you susggesting the OSDT is ridiculous. The OSDT is the elite of all drug test thus far. This must be Manny's concern.

    Manny's camp wants the NASC because they know the current system all to well with it's current flaws and is secondary to the superior OSDT program. They know fighters have a better chance to evade and slip detection, which fighters have done in recent years. Stop making excuse around every corner. If Manny isn't using PEDS then he has nothing to fear - a moniker Manny should remove from his boxing trunks, "NO FEAR".
     
  6. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    *****s are dumb eunuchs.

    their balls have been cut off by king floyd to make sure that no one ****s around with his favorite princess leonard ellerbe.
     
  7. ricardinho

    ricardinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,241
    3
    May 17, 2009
    In order to show you proof we need a drug test.
     
  8. josak

    josak Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,018
    16
    Jan 4, 2007
    Why don't you answer his question and explain why it's a poor analogy? Just calling it poor doesn't make it so.

    I didn't say the OSDT is ridiculous I said the request was ridiculous, because it's based on unfounded suspicions from 1 or 2 people.
     
  9. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    7,856
    0
    Mar 8, 2008
    well, he passed all the tests that was done to him.
     
  10. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    be careful. See Me Fail will challenge you to a boxing fight in LA. :lol::rofl:lol:
     
  11. ricardinho

    ricardinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,241
    3
    May 17, 2009
    they were not random...pac is probably taking epo
     
  12. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    that is why, in the haters mind no drug test can ever clear pacs name.
     
  13. man_on_the_spot

    man_on_the_spot Active Member Full Member

    578
    2
    Jul 13, 2007
    Are you really this ******ed? How are some guys on a message board in the position to give any prove on this matter. The only way to tell is sending someone to Pac's camp and asking him for a sample. What other "prove" could be posted here.
    There is no prove until someone is tested positive or we have some documentation on their methods. There was no prove concering Marion Jones, Lance Armstrong or Roger Clements, but now we can say with great certainty that they were not clean. Beforehand we also only had speculation based on their performance and behaviour.
    Same here, the whole behaviour of camp Pac looks fishy. Either he is not clean or they do not wnat the fight after all...
     
  14. Jab_hard

    Jab_hard Active Member Full Member

    964
    0
    Jul 18, 2009
    Did you see the proof that Margarito used plaster of paris before he was caught ?
     
  15. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,440
    11,475
    Jan 6, 2007


    Mainly, because, while not perfect, the analogy is close to perfect in describing the situation here.

    And SMF knows this. He can't find any flaws in it, so he calls it poor and dumb. Guess who's being dumb, here.