where would wallin rank on joshuas best wins

If AJ fights and beats Wallin that would put him in line to fight Fury if he emerges unified, along with Hyrgovic. In a fair world that pair would be made to box. But they wont be.
If Fury emerges as the winner of 2 fights with Usyk and AJ managed to STOP Wallin, unlikely IMO Hearn would definitely make AJ/Fury if Fury doesn't retire.
Usyk champion he fights Hyrgovic. But all that would take 2 years.

 

He comes across as a bit of a clown that one. He’ll be telling us Holyfield v Lewis 1 was definitely a draw next and that the judges got it right.

 

I'll tell you what was severe trolling or extremely dumb. Is you in another thread claiming prime Wladimir Klitschko vs Deontay Wilder would be a '50-50 fight' jesus christ almighty

 

****ing hell

 

Wlad lost to Puritty, Sanders, Brewster, was saved by the doctor against Williamson, got put down three times by Peter and blew it against Joshua. Wlad never beat anyone better than Ortiz and never fought anyone better than Wilder other than Fury, who schooled him.

Given these facts and Wilder's advantages over Wlad (height, reach, speed, right hand power, chin, self-belief, killer instinct, audacity, unconventional style, experience vs a better opponent in Fury) it would obviously be an extremely dangerous fight for Wlad.

You would have to be blinded by ideology not to see it. If Wilder were 5'11-6'1 with slow-average footspeed like many of Wlad's best wins it would be a different story.

 

That made me cackle, its amazing that posters can be so biased.

 

He several guys who were as good as/better than the 38 year old high blood pressure pill taking Ortiz. He fought Fury at 39 when he was past his best while Fury was at his absolute best. Wilder was downed by Nichols, Sconiers, rocked by Molina, struggled with Szpilka, Duhuapas, got destroyed by light hitting Fury. When they sparred Wilder got dropped repeatedly and beaten up by Wlad, there's a reason he was kept well away from him.

The only one blinded by ideology is you, Wlad would be a clear favourite for a reason (still a dangerous fight).

 

Wilder is at worst 50/50 against any heavy in history with that right hand. This is what the top trumps boxing fans don't seem to understand; just because you are losing for 90% of the fight, if you WIN the fight by KO, you won 100% of the fight.

 

Wonder if anyone wants to revise their opinions in this thread? There's genuinely people in here saying Wallin would be amongst his best wins but I've not seen anyone mention that today

I can't stand Joshua but he's gone from being horribly overrated to actually being underrated I think and can't win with many people.

 

Bollocks.

 

Agree mate was a load of crap. This guy talks complete rubbish.

 

Wallin was never a great fighter. He was overhyped by Fury fanboys because he should’ve stopped him.
Joshua does however deserve credit for his performance in general and the visible adjustments that had been made. He looked really good, no matter who was in front of him.

 

This comment is ageing like prawns left out during a heat wave.

 

The same Parker who won 12-0 against Wilder?

 

Another gem here, how could you have been so blinded by your own agenda? Joshua just destroyed a guy who nearly TKO’d Fury.

Is Parker still a bum after he beat Wilder 12-0? Does that make Wilder a regional level can? It’s amazing how ignorant people can be.