Which Boxing Sanctioning Bodies Would You Most Like To See Disappear?

Isn't it going to be confusing having which you like and hate on the same poll?

 

all of them. have the ring belt as the title

 

yea they realli should only have one or two titles, i say keep WBC (the green belt baybee) n the ring belt

 

yeah because ricky hatton and andre berto were so deserving of their #1 ranking

 

This might have been a great answer a few years ago, but with Golden Boy now owning The Ring Magazine, I will have to disagree.

 

forgot about that. good point.

but then again boxing always was hellishly corrupted even in the good old days.

 

just have three WBC IBF and another one then you can still have unification bouts which are always pretty good

 

Which would be the other one beside WBC and the IBF? I think it's the WBA because they were the first sanctioning body. Anybody else agree?

 

I like to see some one reform the WBA, and overall I'd like to see a return to the old school sanctioning bodies; WBC and WBA.

 

All except for one...dont really care which one, but I went with the WBC...no EXACT reason why the WBC, I just feel there should be one title for each weightclass.

 

I thought the same way in the beginning, (I am from the times were we only had two) but then I changed my mind because if you have 2 sanctioning bodies people will start talking about something else, people will say that someone didnt unify or maybe talking about lineal champions which I personally consider stupid.

The only way to avoid all the doubts about who the real champion is, is by having only one sanctioning body.

 

All of them except the oldest sanctioning body the WBA formerly known as the NBA FROM 1927-1962.

 

I understand your points, but I used to think title unification fights were pretty incredible: Who wasn't JACKED TO THE FREAKING MOON for Lenaord/Hearns or Spinks/Qwaui??