Which country produces the most glass hearted fighters?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Super Hans, Apr 5, 2014.


  1. plank46

    plank46 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    84
    Aug 23, 2013
    t whatever, i've been drinking. t38?
     
  2. plank46

    plank46 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    84
    Aug 23, 2013
    not having a heavy bomber also cost them. the spitfire, and hurricane were great fighters. the decision to stop strategic bombing, and start terror bombing, also cost them.
     
  3. plank46

    plank46 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    84
    Aug 23, 2013
    independent suspension. high speed. short turret. sloped armor.
     
  4. plank46

    plank46 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    84
    Aug 23, 2013
    any comment on my assesment of the battle of france?
     
  5. plank46

    plank46 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    84
    Aug 23, 2013
    the science and industry museum in chicago, has a stuka and spitfire hanging from the ceiling. also has a captured german sub. btw, has the stuka diving, the spitfire on its tail.
     
  6. plank46

    plank46 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    84
    Aug 23, 2013
    heinkel-177? not many then i imagine.
     
  7. plank46

    plank46 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    84
    Aug 23, 2013
    i'm liking it too. you learn what you are taught. unless you look deeper.
     
  8. plank46

    plank46 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    84
    Aug 23, 2013
    must be noon almost there?
     
  9. plank46

    plank46 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    84
    Aug 23, 2013
    23 hours different from here. i'm 3rd shift, up all night.
     
  10. plank46

    plank46 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    84
    Aug 23, 2013
    in my opinion, japan waited to attack in se asia, until france, and the netherlands fell, and the brits were in huge trouble. kinda gutless.
     
  11. plank46

    plank46 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    84
    Aug 23, 2013
    p-38 lightning was a nice plane, as was your mosquito.
     
  12. Koba

    Koba Whimsical Inactivisist Full Member

    8,548
    96
    Apr 28, 2013
    Yeah the 34. Great tank, robust, simple design. The Tiger and Panther were far superior qualitatively but way more expensive to produce and much harder to maintain especially in the field and the Panther in particular really prone to mechanical failures.

    Soviets just kept churning the T-34s out making incremental improvements and building them cheaper and faster as the war progressed (similar to how the Spitfire and 109 were continually refined and up-engined) Truly one of the decisive weapons of the war.

    Nice discussion BTW - keep it up chaps..
     
  13. plank46

    plank46 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    84
    Aug 23, 2013
    the sherman was cheap, easy to maintain. it was referred to as whatever cigarette lighter was popular at the time though.
     
  14. Koba

    Koba Whimsical Inactivisist Full Member

    8,548
    96
    Apr 28, 2013
    The Mossie was a beauty - wooden build to save on metals and harness the skills of underutilised woodworkers and carpenters to war production - thats strategic thinking dammit! Not only that but in many respects it outperformed it's stretched skin contemporaies.
     
  15. plank46

    plank46 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    84
    Aug 23, 2013
    i believe the germans tried to copy it.