Which Do You Prefer????

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rudyard, Apr 30, 2009.


Page 2 of 2
  1. hmm

    hmm damn chairs Full Member

    4,992
    0
    Mar 19, 2009
    hmm says... a war cause a war allows us to see and appreciate each fighters strengths and weaknesses which often are overlooked. Entertaining as hell.

    one sided = leaves questioning the level of competition and possibly discredit to the victor

    brutal KO = DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYEEEEEEM YOU GOT KNOCKED THE FOOK OUT
     
    hmm, Apr 30, 2009
    hmm, Apr 30, 2009
    #16
  2. KayEpps

    KayEpps Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,693
    1
    Jul 25, 2007
    I vote for a WAR!!!!!!
     
    KayEpps, Apr 30, 2009
    KayEpps, Apr 30, 2009
    #17
  3. BobDigi5060

    BobDigi5060 East Side MMA Full Member

    10,898
    2
    Feb 7, 2006
    War.
     
    BobDigi5060, Apr 30, 2009
    BobDigi5060, Apr 30, 2009
    #18
  4. Two Shakes

    Two Shakes Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,927
    176
    Sep 7, 2008
    A chess match between two boxers at the top of there game is what i like but if im honest my all favourite fights re all different kinds of fights including, all out wars,master technicians at work and big mouths being put to sleep in the most violent of fashion.:good
     
    Two Shakes, Apr 30, 2009
    Two Shakes, Apr 30, 2009
    #19
  5. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,334
    3
    Dec 17, 2008
    A brutal KO and a War.

    I love seeing someone get KTFO especially trash talker like mayorga:lol: but i also love to see 2 boxers go at it toe to toe from round 1 to the end of the fight. marquez-vazquez..gatti-ward.. barrera-morales etc etc.

    although a one sided beating like pacman-delahoya was fun to watch, i prefer to watch somebody gets KTFO and 2 boxers go to war:good
     
    Vitor Belfort, Apr 30, 2009
    Vitor Belfort, Apr 30, 2009
    #20
Page 2 of 2