I wasn't thinking when I made that post. The WBC title was the only one Leonard won, and then he gave it up right after so they had a bunch of title fights at the end of the year, one of them Hearns vs. Roldan.
Pacman has to be considered past his prime now, and the Bradley fight even though disputed, was still a loss on the record books.
Duran over Leonard Followed by Leonard over Hagler Followed by Leonard over Hearns Followed by Leonard over Duran
yeah u can tell ther'e a lot of posters that begrudge Duran beating him much like Norris did. it's got to do with LIKING, LOOKS, & LOYALTY more than anything. When u see ""Leonard was just learning his trade" u know something's up. It's always either too soon or too late for him when it comes to losses then when I bring up Camacho's age and condition they still act like he was 24 or when I bring up Camacho whipping the 4 sizes larger Leonard, they clam up altogether the most bombastic shockers of the last 50 yrs: Hagler Hearns, Chavez Taylor, Douglas Tyson, Pryor Arguello. Although I will say that Leonard Hagler (on the surface) ranks up there with Sandoval Chandler which many people did not see. a virtual prospect with not much experience, dominating the reigning champ of four years
By far it was Hagler's ko of Hearns...the one where both men were at their best...Hearns had just demolished Duran and was a monster...so Hagler did what he had to do...in style.