Which fight do you prefer to watch?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Nopporn, Dec 7, 2015.


  1. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,267
    1,737
    Jan 4, 2007
    Between Pacquiao v.s. JMM 5 and Pacquiao v.s Bradley 3.
     
  2. QuadrupleG

    QuadrupleG MAZAFAKA Full Member

    4,309
    3
    May 3, 2014
    Can they all 3 get into the ring and settle their issues ?
     
  3. Jacko

    Jacko Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,552
    8,720
    Apr 25, 2008
    Bradley, as it will be more competitive. JMM would have been out of the ring for two years by the time he fights Pac again.
     
  4. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    Bradley 3. I'd be interested to see what Atlas has him doing in terms of a gameplan. He's also younger and if he beats Manny he can be the new welterweight king and maybe open a path to some Haymon welterweights or Brook who desperately need the chance to prove themselves and for some reason aren't fighting each other.

    JMM 5, meh. If Manny wins decisively (for the first time), it will be because Marquez is old and inactive. If Marquez beats Manny again, I'll just feel bad for him.
     
  5. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,513
    15,927
    Jul 19, 2004
    I'd actually prefer JMM 5, if for no other reason than the fact Pac-JMM usually produced highly entertaining competitive match-ups, while Pac-Bradley produced two less competitive match-ups that were less engaging. But I wouldn't have a problem with either fight.

    Any new ****ytical breakdowns on the horizon, Bogo?

    :smoke
     
  6. Willie Maeket

    Willie Maeket "40 Acres and Mule" -General William T. Sherman Full Member

    13,893
    8,367
    Jun 22, 2015
    :deal:thumbsup
     
  7. aaalbert

    aaalbert Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,041
    2,023
    Jan 15, 2015
    Probably JMM 5 since all 3 matches before the KO were pretty exciting. But because of the inactivity of JMM, I think he's lose this time. :(
     
  8. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    244,896
    240,131
    Nov 23, 2013
    Manny-Marquez because Manny will win decisively and that will set up Pac-Marquez 6:patsch.

    Pac-Bradley 1 & 2 bored me to be honest.
     
  9. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,267
    1,737
    Jan 4, 2007
    Pac v.s. Bradley 1 and 2 were not boring fights at all. :nono Those 2 fights were also competitive and close.
     
  10. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    244,896
    240,131
    Nov 23, 2013
    They weren't that competitive in my eyes, Pac clearly won both.
     
  11. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    seen enough of those....i'll pass
     
  12. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,267
    1,737
    Jan 4, 2007
    Really?
     
  13. Jacko

    Jacko Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,552
    8,720
    Apr 25, 2008
    Unless Pac has deteriorated badly i think he handles JMM easy and might even be the first to stop him. JMM deserves great respect for one of the most shocking KOs in boxing history, but before that shot (and despite the first KD) i thought that Pac was clearly winning, getting stronger and that this fight, unlike the others, had one fighter noticably on top. Add in the two years of inactivity for JMM and i think he gets beats comfortably.
     
  14. StealthUppercut

    StealthUppercut Member Full Member

    392
    3
    Dec 7, 2015
    I'd prefer to watch Pac-Bradley, as I have no desire to watch Pacquiao die in the ring.
     
  15. StealthUppercut

    StealthUppercut Member Full Member

    392
    3
    Dec 7, 2015
    If you look at the run up to that fight, the way Marquez trained, and all his comments beforehand it was quite clear Marquez wasn't going to try to win a decision that time he was going in there to knock him out. Marquez hasn't been that inactive, and unless he is completely shot he was always have Pacquiaos number.