which fight do you think was better tito-vargas or morales-barrera 1

This is a great question, and one I cant answer.

Tito vs Vargas was more dramatic, with the early KD's and with Tito hitting the deck and coming back. Morales vs Barrera was a true war, high caliber boxing between two guys who really didn't like eachother.

Draw all the way.

 

i personally prefered MAB v EM close though

 

Trinidad vs Vargas, because of the drama.

Also, I remember the lead up to the fight was intense, the fight came with a lot of anticipation.

Barrera vs Morales was a suprise to me, I didnt expect THAT kind of war.

 

Barrera v Morales all the way! **** Tito v Vargas, that doesnt even compare to the passion, intensity and overall tenacity, and skill, shown between Eric and Marco. Yes I agree with ACB about this fight being a surprise, but its defo the fight of the year for 2000

 

Its funny, for one reason or another I just didnt anticipate the Morales vs Barerra fight being what it was. I remember watching it and thinking "what is this!?"

If I would have known it was going to be that kind of fight, I would have anticipated it for months and probably would have even more fond memories of it.

And another thing, my heart was always with Barerra when he fought, and I was pissed about the decision in the first fight. Kind of put a damper on it for me.

 

:good I know what you mean, How did the judges score that fight like that!!! Barrera always will be my favourite fighter, and he got robbed in that one

 

As a fight, Morales-Barrera was probably better.

But I actually prefer Tito-Vargas because I'm not so interested in fights between two small guys.

 

Morales/Barrera all the way---it was a sustained war showcasing skill---with no KD's or blood to speak of---great fight-great warriors ---:smoke :smoke

 

He already told you.