which fight do you think was better tito-vargas or morales-barrera 1

Barrera/Morales 1 had more constant back and forth action. Vargas was competitive against Tito but he wavered much more than either Barrera or Morales throughout the entirety of their initial encounter.

 

i think erik -mab was light years better.that was superb!
for me,tito-vargas was good,but not the classic its portrayed to be.

 

of course it is a classic.greatest fight never to be named foty

 

Tito-Vargas

 

Barrera vs. Morales 1 easily.

 

I feel the action was more consistent in Trinidad-Vargas regardless of what people say.

 

I think;
Holmes-Norton
Leonard -Duran 1
Holyfield-Bowe 2
Were all better,and thats just 3 off the top of my head.

 

Forget Holyfield-Bowe 2:bart

 

Tito - Vargas was better. Just look how it ended. Vargas had the worst minute of his life in that first round. Came back and fought his ****ing heart out, maybe even literally he might have lost a piece of his heart in that fight. And the ending was just drastic. I mean you truly see a man who has given all he had, and just got too much to take in return. Great great fight.

 

Barrera-Morales by a mile.

 

Barrera-Morales was more evenly matched,thats why there was no multi-knockdowns and dramatic ending.Those fights are harder when there is no real gap in talent.
Tito just made hard work of beating an inferior fighter to him,and took his usual trip to the floor on the way.That doesnt make it better for me skillwise(fuk no,i think the 2 Mexicans are far more skilful)or even entertainment wise.