Which fight is closer? Jmm-Pac 3 or Bradley-Pac?

For me

Pac won by 7 rounds to 5 against Bradley (Bradley won the last 4 rounds)

JMM won by 9 rounds to 3 against Pac, was a big time robbery.

 

10oz, 1PunchKO95, astrojoe86, bballchump11, beefman180, Cinderella Man, el_indio, FilipMNE, floyd_g.o.a.t, FNF Main Event, Hands of Iron, Hydro11, IsaL, jeffjoiner, KaraMel, Lemons, MVC, orriray59, Pecsaetan, sbbigmike, silenc, SJS19, Smokin' Joe, SouthpawJab, SoxNation, Thatman, theboy_racer, turbotime, Zombieguy

29 that voted bradley vs pac and half of it are the usual haters.

 

I don't understnad why your waisting your time with someone who's completely in denial. That's just as bad as trying convince a chick that sleeps with different men with money that she's a trick, even though her mind tells her she isn't. When you know the truth, you shouldn't waist your time because them trying to except it even after you provided evidence causes cognitive dissonance in them. So your waisting youe time.

 

Damn, Pacquiao-Marquez 3 is on the commanding lead at the moment.

 

Which is mostly down the the publicity each fight recieved, when JMM got robbed their was outrage among Boxing fans online, when Pac got robbed it was news everywhere even amongst casual observers.

Scoring both fights round by round though, Bradley won more rds against Pac than Pac did against JMM.

 

it's like compiling a list of *****s and pac's usual haters.

 

no.

if you score those rounds for timmy, you must be counting shots landing on gloves.

 

I thought Jeff Mayweather summed it up best.

“I thought it was highway robbery,” Mayweather would tell me on Monday afternoon from the Mayweather Boxing Club. “I actually thought that Pacquiao won at least ten out of twelve rounds. It was hard to give Tim Bradley even two rounds. There were a couple rounds that were just feeling out rounds and I gave those to Bradley. In the tenth round he performed real well, but other than that he was losing.”

“I think it was pretty obvious his technique was nothing but wild,” said Mayweather. “He did have a good jab. I think Pacquiao is very easy to hit with a jab. That was the only punch he had that was effective. I give [Bradley] credit though, he still had some balls. He stood in there and tried to swap with Pacquiao even though he’s not a puncher. It wasn’t a completely bad performance, it’s just that he was overmatched, that’s all.”

 

No, incorrect.

 

Here's a round by round take on the Pac-JMM III fight from a british boxing writir. Interesting read, definitely points to a very, very close fight.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/ot...an-Manuel-Marquez-round-by-round-verdict.html

here's another link, this guy scored it 7-5 for Marquez, but look at the rounds.

they have different scores for 5 out of 12 rounds. It's not like 1 or 2 rounds could be seen either way. The fight was ****ing close.

http://content.usatoday.com/communi...z-trilogy-enters-final-chapter/1#.UGOYpY1lQhw

 

Pacquiao/Marquez could have been scored 7-5 either way or a draw. I have no issue with that fight. Everyone knows it was close.

Pacquiao/Bradley was a near shut out. Not competitive in the slightest.

 

**** sake Jack, come on.

 

Not incorrect

Bradley won round 1 and 9-12, that's 5 rounds

7-5 = close but clear for Pac.

 

Is this even a question? Pac vs Bradley was a one sided beatdown, cant argue that. Pac vs Marquez, I had it for pac 7-5. Alot of close rounds, I gave some to Marquez but majority of them, I gave to Pac since he was the champion.

 

Anyone scoring PAC/JMM III a draw or for Pac doesn't know **** about Boxing.

Was the clearest of their 3 fights in JMM's favour.