Which fight represents a bigger challenge Pac vs Bradley or Floyd vs Cotto ?

Bradley is the bigger challenge. Pacquiao did not fake a retirement and watch Bradley go through war after war before finally challenging him.

 

Well that's my opinion on the matter, and in case i am mistaken, that's what we were asked for? :think

 

The guys who are sayin Bradley is cause Cotto has gone by now and they keep fingers crossed that Pac loses. What kinda question and poll is this. Bradley and Cotto. Cotto was in Bradley's place some five or six years ago to say the least.

 

Bradley will enver be as good as Cotto.

 

The reason Bradley doesn't have any losses is because he ducked Khan. You think if he'd fought Cotto's opposition - Margarito, Pacquiao, Mayweather - he WOULDN'T have lost?

You Bradley nuthuggers are getting worse and worse.

 

Floyd with Cotto. Moving up in weight to 154. Manny is making Bradley come up to 147. Strange considering how he likes the idea of catchweights to even it out( Cotto at 145 etc.) surely since Manny could easily make 145 he could have had one for this fight giving Bradley some chance.

 

Still cranky about Pacquiao making Morales say "No Mas"?:bbb

 

Bradley more challenge. Cotto was shot and no good.

 

stupid ***** Manny only 144 for 147 fight. 145 for Cotto was good deal.:deal

 

i'd have to say cotto because he's a battle tested warrior who had fought, won and lost on the big stage, and was coming off a big win that rid him of the demons that haunted him in the aftermath of margarito 1, not to mention stylistically, he's a much more well rounded fighter with bigger punching power than tim bradley. if pacquiao loses to tim bradley, it's not because of bradley, it's because of pacquiao.

 

Stop with this ****. Cotto is a small LMW. Stop acting like he is much bigger than Floyd.