Which fight today would add most to Mayweather's legacy?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by abuffy, Sep 1, 2015.


  1. abuffy

    abuffy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,653
    12
    Jan 10, 2015
    Or can his legacy even be improved at this point?
     
  2. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,364
    240,891
    Nov 23, 2013
    Golovkin :happy
     
  3. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,541
    16,033
    Jul 19, 2004
    At his age, and at this stage, there isn't much he could do. Beating the winner of Cotto-Canelo probably does the most when considering financials alongside the legacy factor of becoming lineal middleweight champion, but since he already dominated those 2, I'm not sure it does as much as it would have had he not already soundly beaten both.

    But Floyd is largely at a lose-lose point with a lot of potential opponents. GGG for example. A win over him at 154 would be largely discredited in the same light Ward's victory against Dawson is discredited, but it would be even worse because Golovkin lacks the credentials Dawson had going into the Ward bout. So GGG would be written off as a weight drained "bum" who never beat anyone better than (take your pick - Murray, is his best win in my view). And if Golovkin beat Floyd, a loss at this point would be more damaging to Floyd's legacy than any potential victory against anyone 160 or lower.

    I guess if enough people buy into the Pac injury con, a win against "healthy" Pac could be a choice as well.

    But at the end of the day, what makes the most sense for Floyd is targeting one of the big 3 cash cows whom he already beat comfortably.

    :smoke
     
  4. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,050
    24,031
    Feb 19, 2007
    golovkin, no doubt. a win at 160 (floyd can weigh what he wants) is the stuff legends are made of.
     
  5. acie2g

    acie2g Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,738
    1,302
    Jul 21, 2010
    The Cotto-Alvarez winner is the biggest fight from a financial and legacy standpoint, great fighters rematch all the time half of those have been less competitive than May-Cotto or Alvarez I.

    Beating the Lineal and Legitimate MW Champ does more than any other fight second would of been Brook for Undisputed WW Champ if the WBO didn't strip him.
     
  6. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,541
    16,033
    Jul 19, 2004
    Agreed with everything you said, except I don't remember too many fights that were less competitive than Mayweather-Alvarez. That was a textbook one-sided exhibition if ever there was one.

    :smoke
     
  7. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,271
    38,046
    Aug 28, 2012
    Wladimir Klitschko.
     
  8. acie2g

    acie2g Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,738
    1,302
    Jul 21, 2010
    It's all subjective I thought Alvarez won anywhere from 2-4 reds and Cotto 3. Canelos bodywork and activity edged a few rounds to me.

    Both were more competitive than the Pacquiao fight and people want a rematch to that. I don't understand how Mayweather is the only great fighter who gets bashed for potentially rematching another great fighter on a streak.
     
  9. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,541
    16,033
    Jul 19, 2004
    (In my best Leonard Nimoy voice)

    "FASCINATING."

    :smoke
     
  10. abuffy

    abuffy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,653
    12
    Jan 10, 2015
    I'd rather see Pacquiao rematch Cotto.

    Mayweather rematches don't appeal to me because I know doing better against him a second time is slim to none. You're more likely to do much, much worse. I see all three fights being wider than their first. Canelo couldn't get much wider though:lol:
     
  11. abuffy

    abuffy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,653
    12
    Jan 10, 2015
    RIP Spock:-(
     
  12. acie2g

    acie2g Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,738
    1,302
    Jul 21, 2010
    Mayweather is slowing down and the winner of there fight would be coming into a stride my argument for both.

    Cotto should he win would be coming off probably his best victory, a lot of people are questioning his MW run based off Geale and Martinez so him beating Alvarez would prove its the real deal two HOFer possibly two ATGs going at it.

    For Alvarez they say he was to green and drained well it would be three years later Alvarez has shown imo in the Lara fight he learned from the Mayweather fight attack the body when the target is moving. Wins over Angulo, Lara, Kirkland, & Cotto since their original bout that's also a huge matchup.

    Mayweather-Pacquiao and Cotto-Canelo are/were the two biggest and best matches to be made in boxing the winners of each respective match going head to head would naturally be the next step.

    I'm not big on Cw but at 156+ I'd def be interested don't see why not.
     
  13. acie2g

    acie2g Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,738
    1,302
    Jul 21, 2010
    You'd be surprised just off the top of my head regarding Mayweather I had him winning both Castillo fights had Castillo II closer, thought Maidana I could be argued a draw, along with Alvarez winning 2-4 rounds. **** I thought Garcia dominated Matthysse and Bradley arguably beat Pac in fight I and got a draw fight II
     
  14. abuffy

    abuffy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,653
    12
    Jan 10, 2015
    I don't think Mayweather would go beyond 154. He might get them to come down to 153. Who knows. Money talks. There'd be a cw though, for sure. Lol
     
  15. acie2g

    acie2g Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,738
    1,302
    Jul 21, 2010
    If a rematch came off there's no doubt it would be above JMW or else what's the point? And even though I'm not a big fans of catch weight for the MW title that is nothing new. Didn't Martinez and Cotto win there titles at Catchweights also Hopkins unified 4 MW Titles at a Cw vs Hoya.

    I'm not big on it but it is what it is.