Which fight was better?

There's got to be a voice to counter the moronic fanboy train who ignore the facts - Fraudnelo is a weight jumping cherrypicker, and a match fixing, card stacking, judge buying, fake Mexican ginger cheat

 

First one - great little punch up.

 

Both modern day classics, two future Hall of famers doing their thing. The second fight was absolutely gruelling and toe to toe. Canelo fought like a man possessed and Golovkin was pin point focused the entire fight. Thought that GGG pulled it out down the stretch in a fight where there was alot of close rounds. Thought GGG won both fights though.

 

The first one was a classic, they got the decision terribly wrong though...

 

No literally, idk why half the forum is so eager to talk about how bad the decision was every single day.

 

The second fight

 

You mean put on a boxing clinic, right?

 

For me the second one.

1 was a good fight but was ultimately a convincing GGG win type performance. If an A sider put in that performance against a 4th or 5th ranked fighter no one would have called for an immediate rematch.

2 was much closer and more entertaining with Canelo winning closely, but clearly bossing it in my eyes