Which fight was more competitive - Pac-Bradley or Mayweather-Cotto?

cotto won 5 rounds in that fight,tim maybe won 4 max.the rounds cotto won he clearly won ,the rounds bradley won he just inched out.mayweather was bleeding and showed damage pac did not.mayweather layed in the corner and got outworked but yet compubox showed floyd as more active?tim runs away the last 4 rds to avoid ko and judges call it a boxing lesson?im started to feal like when i was 10 years old and i finally realized that wwf wrestling was fake and the outcomes were predetermined.boxing is bull****.

 

Delete

 

Coasting? Pacquiao was getting outboxed the last 3 rounds he wasnt coasting ****. Bradleys jab was in his ****ing face. He was "coasting" like he coasted against Marquez and Mosley meaning he doesnt have any ****ing idea how to cut the ring off or fight someone with movement.

Mayweather who had Cotto ****ed up bleeding out his ass and wobbling around the ring coasted.

 

If you're going to use the face argument, Pacquaio ****ed Cotto up way harder than Mayweather.

He landed the same shot he landed on Cotto on Bradley.

Bradley just doesn't bruise or cut easily. That's stupid logic to go by.

Neither fight was competitive.

And throwing a flicker jab on some gloves and then getting caught with hard counters doesn't equal "outboxing." It equals you don't know **** about boxing if you think it does.

 

Bradley doesnt bruise easily either lol. Because he barely haf a ****ing mark on his face.

Bradley was hitting gloves. And pacquiao was hitting air. Difference was Brradley was throwing and boxing. Pacquiao was just coming forward in straight lines with a stupid look on his face.

Same look he had against Marquez.

Bradley was totally comfortable in that fight. With 2 injuries. Pacquiao looked like ****.

 

You're just trollin. Why do you do this dumb****?

 

I wouldn't say Bradley looked completely comfortable. At one point I literally thought he might cry as he walked back to his corner with his head down.

 

I thought Mayweather won more rounds against Cotto than Pacquiao did against Bradely, but I thought the Mayweather fight was more competitive.

 

I gave Cotto 3 rounds and gave Bradley 4 rounds......buuuuut the rounds Cotto won were more obvious and clearer wins. All in all they're pretty even.......but boxing is scored on a round by round basis not a damage basis. Bradley made more rounds close than Cotto but Cotto won the rounds he won by bigger margins. Mayweathers offense was much more effective than Pacs, Cotto's offense was slightly more effective than Bradleys

 

There was actually a point in the Floyd vs Cotto fight where I said "Holy ****, Cotto might win this" ...but I NEVER came close to that in the Pac vs Bradley fight... it was the prime example of an ELITE fighter vs a good one

 

Manny was a little more competitive then Cotto on the scorecards but he didn't fight as hard.

 

Anyone who says Bradley is a hater or like sixteen living in his mom's basement. Bradley gave a good effort and was simply outclassed. Cotto had a good, gritty fight where Floyd had to work to win, which he obviously did. Manny was business as usual and shut Bradley out.

 

Then you dont know how to score a fight. Cotto won 2 (3 at most) rounds the entire fight, in a competitive great fight. That fight was not in question at all going into the 10th. smh.

 

This..