lol watch how Mayweather claims the PPV king once again. he got Broner, Khan on the undercard on a mexican holiday. hahahahaha and he call himself PPV king.
It did not have the big "names" , but PAC-Bradley II undercard had much better fights. Because they werent intended as A-side exhibition fights like the Floyd card. It was actually a lot more entertaining. Having big names means nothing when they are put in with mismatches. The PAC card had competiive matches, and I think should get credit for that even if it was not the most (read: at all) expensive undercard.
The Moment. You had lots of star power on the card. You had the p4p king in a dog fight, and three of the four fights were pretty entertaining.
Personally, i preferred the Hopkins - Shumenov fight over the other two with Porter and Hopkins fights being A1! The Pacquiao - Bradley under cards were not too thrilling to me, and the outcome of the main event was all too predictable. The Mayweather fight for me had two good fights comparable to Hopins-Shumenov. Khan - Collazo and the main event. For me, the best of these three fights were; 1. Hopkins - Shumenov 2. Mayweather- Maidana 3. Paquiao - Bradley In that order.
What about the Thurman fight? Matthysse and Figueroa. That was free to subscribers. 1. Mayweather, 2. Hopkins, 3. Pacquiao borefest
I think Floyd should have had that fight on his undercard instead of Broner, then I would have voted his card #1, and Hopkins #2, but Porter stole the show and Hopkins is #1, for me.
