which fighters physique or build would you want?

It's enquirer. If he doesn't agree, you're wrong. :bart

 

You need to smoke crack.

All real gansters from the hood do it.

 

:nono Never get high on your own supply.

 

I know that line but it does not have to be his own supply.

He should be taking a daily dose of it at any rate.

 

then how do you explain your weight gain?
Frequency of meals does not affect weight gain if there's no calorie surplus.

 

Virus,relentless and small,you guys are probably not educated enough to understand how eating frequency affects insulin levels,eostrogen levels,test levels,growth hormone,igf 1,cortisol and so on....I will give you a year to study,then come back and discuss...
And virus,if anyone thinks their view is gospel its you, 'mister i dont know **** all about boxing,nor have i ever sparred but i will tell muhammed ali how to train because i read a few back issues of flex/muscle mag and train schmoes in a little gym'.....

LATEST STOP PRESS; Weights dont work for everyone (nor are they needed for everyone.) ,nor do multiple meals over three work for everyone.....Evidence? Millions of successful athletes over history.
END.

 

:smoke Sparred plenty pak man.....
And why does he have to eat every three hours,tell me if you know so much?.....
'WAITS FOR RELENTLESS' GOOGLE SEARCH....

 

You wouldnt understand even if i told you....
Good day pak man.

 

Thanks for proving my point.

A few things - I've never read flex/muscle magazine, I've never claimed to know a thing about boxing and I wouldn't have a problem telling ANYONE how to train if it's the basics like conditioning and strength training.
Also, weights can work for everyone if used correctly. Give me a link to a study proving weights "don't work for everyone". I don't understand how weights can't work if used correctly.

One more thing, like I told the other guy go to T-Nation.com and argue with the guys proving this stuff works. I go by what actual professionals say. The 5 or 6 meals a day theory works if done correctly.

Should I believe, Mike Roussell, John Berardi, Chad Waterbury, Alwyn Cosgrove, Chris Shugart, Christian Thibaudeau and Charles Poliquin with a combined experience of more than 100 years of training saying 6 meals a day works or should I believe enquirer, some random guy on a boxing forum who seems to love copy/pasting wikipedia.... It's a tough one.

 

Honestly?
The only thing I know about frequency of meals is that it doesn't cause insulin spikes. Body without food then suddenly something appears, causes an insulin spike, which isn't good because after the spike there is a drop.
So frequent meals.

Weights don't harm anyone my friend. But anyway, I really don't know enough on the subject of nutrition to win a war of words here, so I'm going to stop.

You mentioned, however, millions of successful athletes.
They would have been successful regardless of if they ate 3 meals or 6 meals a day, they had the talent, heart, determination, the intangibles to get them where they got to. The same applies to the running boxers used to do. Rocky Marciano ran miles and miles every day of the year.
Studies HAVE shown, and there's no denying this, that if A) he took a rest day b) he incorporated some kind of quicker running, sprints, in intervals for example c) he would have had some kind of extra strength training , he WOULD have been a "better" athlete. Higher anaerobic capacity, higher work capacity, stronger, possibly faster. Note how I say possibly!
But that's all hogwash - the man was a beast, and he trained as such.

How can proper supplemental work harm you? Why are people so adamant against strength training? What's the love for long, long, long runs?
The old champs did/didn't do them. If they DID, they wouldn't have been unsuccessful, I think people should realise this.

Why haven't other sports suffered from weight training, or any other MODERN training "technique"?
Football players, I'm sure they didn't all do deadlifts/power cleans, all that good stuff, since the begginning of time.

Anyway. Getting off subject.

That is all!