Which fighters sub-190 pounds could beat Riddick Bowe ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Unforgiven, Jul 7, 2011.


  1. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
    No one weighing 190 or lower would ever be favored vs the '92 version of bowe. During that short span, Riddick was one of the best heavys I've seen.
     
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,158
    53,573
    Feb 11, 2005
    Against who? A hit or miss, completely inconsistent Holyfield who was considered nothing more that a placeholder in the division at the time? The same guy feigning heart problems against Michael Moorer only to be miraculously cured by Benny Hinn? And then who? Who is the second best fighter Bowe ever really beat? It's probably Pierre Coetzer or Herbie Hide. I think that speaks volumes to his true pedigree.
     
  3. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    Bowe was a big heavyweight. Maybe Spinks could do it if he weighed 190, but it would be tough.
     
  4. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,059
    3,581
    Dec 18, 2004

    Which basically proves my point. His list of opponents wasn't that impressive, yet loads of good writers thought he'd win.

    He'd faced the same amount of unbeaten fighters Holyfield had- one.



    The reason this fight was close to pick 'em, was simply down to Bowe's boxing ability and size. What he lacked in experience he had in tools. That's why 46 out of 48 writers picked him to win the rematch (I bet the same amount picked Norton when he went in with Ali for the rematch didn't they? You know because this was oh so similar :yep) . He looked too big and strong for Evander in fight one, hence why Holyfield came in a bigger & stronger for the rematch. It isn't rocket science you know. :good
     
  5. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    259
    Oct 22, 2009
    :thumbsup
     
  6. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    119
    Jun 30, 2008
    Yeah, Holyfield lost all the damn time in the 90's. Moorer is just one example of another man he lost to, and he never really proved it was a fluke in a rematch or anything. I see your point, man, hit or miss perfectly sums up Holyfield. He was just a placeholder for Tyson too, because, you know, he wasn't as good as Tyson. That's what everybody thought, at the time, ya know? Totally important. He was like a fake champion. It's not like Holyfield beat the **** out of Tyson when he was probably farther removed from his prime, right? I mean, damn near every sub-190 fighter would beat Holyfield, you know, man, so Bowe's wins aren't really a big deal. I don't even want to imagine what Tommy Loughran, Roy Jones, or Bob Fitzsimmons would do to Bowe.
     
  7. Joe E

    Joe E Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,361
    42
    May 12, 2007
    :-(
     
  8. Joe E

    Joe E Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,361
    42
    May 12, 2007
    And the ones I didnt highlight would have a chance.
     
  9. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,059
    3,581
    Dec 18, 2004

    Tommy Loughran. :yep

    ps. By the way I know you're being sarcastic. Just laughing at someone earlier suggesting Loughran could beat Bowe. Their evidence probably being the couple of rounds he won against the mighty Carnera. :lol:
     
  10. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    119
    Jun 30, 2008
    We all know Loughran would have beaten Carnera had the giant's foot not reduced his own to mush. Think about that: Loughran won those couple of rounds with a hole where his foot should have been! And remember, Carnera was big, Bowe was big. Need I say more?

    Subtlety. I'm good at.
     
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    Holyfield was unbeaten in 1992.
    Holyfield was very good. Who cares if he was seen as a "placeholder" by a bunch of over-critical dicks, most of whom never boxed in their lives ? Holyfield was a very good champion and Bowe had to fight a great fight to beat him.

    (Why do you say he feigned heart problems ? That came later, against Moorer, and he didn't "feign" anything. He fought injured, or was just plain old (after two hard fights with Bowe), and was diagnosed by a doctor and told to retire. It's completely irrelevant to the Bowe 1992 fight, just an excessive dig at Bowe and Holyfield.)

    You only have to watch the Holyfield-Bowe fight of 1992 to see that these two were extremely good heavyweights on that night.
     
  12. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,680
    14,056
    Jan 4, 2008
    I fully agree. Too much time is spent on watching Boxrec instead of the actual fights around here.
     
  13. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    259
    Oct 22, 2009
    IT was certainly a good and fun fight but it was also a dumb fight from both, tactically, and exposed holes in the game of both. Big ones, especially in Bowe´s.
     
  14. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    It was a great heavyweight fight between two superb heavyweights.
    Perhaps Holyfield fought a bit dumb, he hadn't accounted for Bowe's heart and stamina.

    I don't think was any "dumber", tactically or strategically, or exposed more holes, than the fights of Ali-Frazier-Foreman.
     
  15. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,680
    14,056
    Jan 4, 2008
    How was it a dumb fight tactically for Bowe and what was exposed concerning him? He fought the perfect fight, I'd say.