Which Heavyweight Champion benefited most from weak competition?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by la-califa, May 19, 2010.


  1. BoxingFanNo1

    BoxingFanNo1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,867
    13
    Jan 20, 2009
    Yeah, I'm sure Lewis was shitting in his pants about facing the 'mighty' Chris Byrd.

    No fighter and I mean NO fighter continually faces the best, not SRR not Ali not Foreman NO-ONE. When people say 'he faced the best' they mean continuasly throughout their career, not just one fighter:patsch
    The fact Byrd is all you can bring up speaks volumes.

    Anyway you said 'He avoided slippery boxers most of his career'.
    I want names.:deal
     
  2. pugilistspecialist

    pugilistspecialist Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,966
    8
    Jul 19, 2004
    Rocky Marciano.....susceptible too cuts, leaky defense, undersized, and all his top rate opponents were old and past prime. Charles was the closest to his prime but had over 80 fights by the time of their first fight and was clearly slowed down and become an easier target to tag. Both Charles and Walcott started at lightheavyweight and lower.

    Had he stayed around to face Sonny Liston, Floyd Patterson, or Ingo he may not have retired undefeated. He never beat a prime all time great or near great. Just a bunch of good to very good contenders and washed up past greats.

    The most overrated heavyweight champion of all-time
     
  3. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    -Why the hatred for Byrd, he earned his title shot by beating the "Mighty" Tua, often touted as one of Lewis' strongest defenses. Trying to get his career back on track, Tua was also in much better shape against Byrd. Not sure why you people equate ducking=SHITTING PANTS IN TERROR. Sometimes its about risk/reward and Byrd was actually considered an "avoided" fighter before Lewis because he makes fighters look bad win or lose. Holyfield admitted to ducking him for some time because he didn't want to look foolish. Nothing is certain in boxing anyway, silly to dismiss a number one contender cause "we all know Lewis would crush him in 1.".

    -The person who made that post did not mean that. This is a topic of title defenses. He said Lewis actively sought out the best but he ducked a deserving contender for a NAME.

    -Yes, throughout his career, Lewis was never matched against fast slippery boxers for whatever reason. I don't know, when he was on the comeback trail guys like Donald and Mathis Jr. would have been interesting I suppose, more interesting than Morrison. Now don't act like a moron and take that as Lewis ducked said fighters, just wasn't matched against them at any point...for his entire career. Now as Champion he ducked Byrd as the fight was on the table several times and he walked away. I for one would like to have seen Lewis prove himself against a faster boxer but it never came to be, I think its an interesting question mark.
     
  4. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    From the Horses Mouth. This is a year after Lewis already dropped his title to avoid Byrd and face Tyson. Deserving got nothing to do with it, Johnson knocked out Savarese!!!


    Question: What has Johnson done to deserve this fight?

    Lewis: Johnson has been around a long time. He had a great knockout against Lou Savarese. I think he is well deserving of a shot. I think he is very dangerous, and I think it is about time he gets a chance to box the heavyweight champion of the world.

    Question: Is Johnson more deserving than Chris Byrd?

    Lewis: I cannot fight everyone at once. I have to take one at a time. I think Kirk Johnson is a more exciting fighter than Chris Byrd. A lot of people agree with me when it comes to that. Johnson throws some heavy punches and is a knockout fighter. This is what people want to see. They want to see a fight, they want to see punches and they want to see action.
     
  5. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,621
    46,254
    Feb 11, 2005
    Anyone who contends that Lewis ducked any fighter, or that he did not have one of, if not the most, brutal reign of defenses is clearly pushing an agenda.
     
  6. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    I hate black men with British accents...so fruity. :rofl

    At any rate if you feel three consecutive defenses against Grant, Botha, and Tua before getting KOed by Rahman is the most brutal reign of defenses in history than so be it.
     
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,621
    46,254
    Feb 11, 2005
    Please to list the heavyweight- champion or not- who fought more, and harder punchers than this list of opponents:

    Mason
    Weaver
    Ruddock
    Tucker
    Bruno
    Morrison
    McCall
    Golota
    Briggs
    Holyfield
    Grant
    Tua
    Rahman
    Tyson
    Klitschko

    You're not going to find one. Case closed.
     
  8. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009

    :roll:

    Sorry, thought the tread was about quality of undisputed Heavyweight title defenses, not namedropping everybody you could find on boxing rec without context.

    At any rate Ali:

    Cleveland Williams
    Sonny Liston
    Earnie Shavers
    George Foreman
    Joe Frazier
    Henry Cooper
    Ron Lyle
    Floyd Patterson
    Zora Folley
    ....etc. yawn
     
  9. Ramon Rojo

    Ramon Rojo Active Member Full Member

    624
    22
    Dec 5, 2005
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,621
    46,254
    Feb 11, 2005
    Sure the thread has been derailed. They always are.

    And the list you provide doesn't compare to Lewis'. Lyle, Patterson, Foley and Cooper were not in the class of Bruno, Morrison, Tua and Tyson in terms of power.

    And just so you know I'm not boxrec-ing, I was at a decent number of those Lewis defenses.
     
  11. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005

    Brutal? Sure he faced a lot of dangerous punchers, but how many A level Ring technicians did lennox face? He certainly proved himself against punchers(while suffering two one punch kayo losses along the way), but he did not beat any great boxer types. Bowe was that man. We all know Bowe ducked Lewis by throwing his belt in the trash, but I was reading my 1994 May issue of KO Magazine and it talked about Rock Newman scheduling a future march date with Lennox Lewis, but how it was ruined by lennox getting knocked out by Oliver McCall.
     
  12. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,123
    25,292
    Jan 3, 2007
    Agreed,

    The whole concept of thoroughly " cleaning out " an entire era, has gotten to the point where its taken entirely too literally.. Beating the best should not necessarily mean fighting every guy with a heart beat.
     
  13. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Yes, this is probably # 1.

    I think Walcott's up there too


    Joe Louis 2x
    Rocky Marciano 2x
    Elmer Ray 3x
    Lee Q Murray
    Tommy Gomez
    Hatchetman Sheppard
    Tiger Jack Fox 2x
    Lorenzo Pack
    Hein Ten Hoff
    Rex Layne
    Abe Simon
     
  14. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009

    :lol: Yeah, comparing the percieved bottom four to the the percieved top four will certainly do that. Liston, Foreman, and Shavers are generally regarded as the 3 biggest punchers in history...but **** that, Morrison, Tua, and Bruno were beasts!!!!

    -OH MY GOD!!! FOR REALZ! IS HE REALLY DAT TALL, DO YOU THINK HIZ DREADS ARE REAL OR EXTENSIONS?
     
  15. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Yeah, but this isn't the case with Lewis trashing his IBF belt and ducking Byrd for over 2 years.