Which heavyweight champions fought the best fighter on the planet most often.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Mar 27, 2023.



  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    108,300
    38,880
    Mar 21, 2007
    Jeffries wasn't the lineal champ or the number one contender.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    108,300
    38,880
    Mar 21, 2007
    That is a bullseye, and pulls Liston of the losing list.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef and swagdelfadeel like this.
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    108,300
    38,880
    Mar 21, 2007
    And that is definitely Ring?
     
  4. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,346
    10,022
    Jan 4, 2008
    He had retired as lineal champion, just like Louis and Ali.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    108,300
    38,880
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yes, but a new lineage had been established in the interim, unlike Louis and Ali.
     
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,346
    10,022
    Jan 4, 2008
    Ok, wasn't Charles recognised by all the relevant orgs (Holmes of course wasn't)? Was there anyone else with a claim besides Charles before Louis made the comeback?
     
  7. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    48,595
    12,608
    Jul 19, 2004
    I believe technically not. I think the NYSAC was for some reason vacant until the Louis fight. So you are correct that no one else had a claim, however.
     
    Bokaj likes this.
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    108,300
    38,880
    Mar 21, 2007
    There was a full on schism, in fact.

    The answer, basically, is no.

    But that doesn't matter for the purposes of this thread, being honest.
     
  9. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,346
    10,022
    Jan 4, 2008
    Yeah, I got this from Boxrec "Entering the fight, Charles was recognized as the Heavyweight Champion of the World only by the National Boxing Association. After defeating Louis, all except the British Boxing Board of Control recognized Charles as champion."

    So, yes, a new lineage doesn't seem to have been established before.
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  10. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    48,595
    12,608
    Jul 19, 2004
    I still stand by what I said earlier about Jackson, Ezzard, and Larry, although I likewise realize McGrain is approaching this exercise differently.

    But with Larry and Ezzard (and even with Jack Johnson when you factor in a greater context) - those are all examples of a new champion solidifying his status by beating a retired champion who returned to action having never lost his distinction inside the ring.
     
    Bokaj likes this.
  11. Finkel

    Finkel Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,999
    3,322
    Feb 10, 2020
    I like your list.

    Personally, in the context of this list, I don't see any issue with benefiting from a "weak champion", Douglas still beat Tyson, and Rahman still beat Lewis.

    On the other side of the coin, Joe Louis benefited from a "defacto" number 1 contender. Galento was Ring #1, Louis beats him, 3 months later Louis beats Pastor.
     
  12. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,283
    16,015
    Jun 25, 2014
    Last edited: Mar 28, 2023
    Bokaj likes this.
  13. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,346
    10,022
    Jan 4, 2008
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    108,300
    38,880
    Mar 21, 2007
    No, it's absolutely fine (for the purposes of this discussion) that Wlad was ranked below that when he met Byrd, the number one is the number one. I'll have a rummage around TBRB tonight for a look at Pulev, but either way this is a nice lift for Wladimir.
     
    Dubblechin likes this.
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    108,300
    38,880
    Mar 21, 2007