Which heavyweight era had more talent, the Klitschko era, or the post-Klitschko era?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by catchwtboxing, Jun 13, 2025.


Klitschko era or Post Klitschko era

  1. Klitschko era

    36.2%
  2. Post Klitschko era

    63.8%
  1. Ryeece

    Ryeece Member Full Member

    122
    106
    Apr 18, 2020
    If W Kiltschko was around today would he have gone 9.5 years holding the belts without losing? Maybe but not sure.
     
    DaRealJT and catchwtboxing like this.
  2. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,297
    8,595
    Oct 8, 2013
  3. ArseBandit

    ArseBandit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,533
    2,347
    Apr 22, 2012
    Exaclty, well past prime Sasha and Waldo where force enough with them.

    The post Klit era had closer fights, but if the Klits had been around in their prime later they would have been dominant just the same.
     
    MaccaveliMacc and catchwtboxing like this.
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    397,787
    79,890
    Nov 30, 2006
    I feel like most people are too dumb to realize parity and quality have nothing to do with each other. You can have both, you can have just one, you can have just the other, and you can have neither.

    The question is phrased unambiguously to emphasize the latter quality and people keep answering in terms of the former.
     
  5. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    397,787
    79,890
    Nov 30, 2006
    It was criticized for valid reasons. In overall depth of quality it didn't stack up to its three predecessor decades. It also had a big drop from the brothers to all their runners-up. But that doesn't mean this one isn't worse. Those runners-up from the aughts were superior to all but one HW today.

    What you have now is (besides Usyk) a bunch of profoundly mediocre heavyweights all willing to fight each other and often putting on entertaining battles. That's well and fine, but it doesn't make them, or this era, rich in quality talent.
     
  6. ideafix12

    ideafix12 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,938
    818
    Jul 30, 2010
    WK era was better

    WK
    VK
    Prime Povetkin
    Haye
    Chambers
    Tony Thompson
    Peter
    Pulev
    Ibragimov
    Jennings
    Chagaev
    Chisora
    Byrd
    Takam
     
  7. KO_King

    KO_King Horizontal Heavyweight Full Member

    684
    1,456
    Apr 16, 2023
    The double K era was largely filled with drab defences against weak opposition, bar one or two. The post K era is more talented - and infinitely more entertaining.
     
    catchwtboxing and Toney F*** U like this.
  8. chacal

    chacal F*** the new normal Full Member

    14,779
    12,223
    Jun 21, 2015
    I refuse to vote for any of those eras, I dont like any of them
     
    catchwtboxing likes this.
  9. OddR

    OddR Active Member Full Member

    1,485
    1,522
    Jan 8, 2025
    Today's era has better matchmaking which is the biggest difference IMO.
     
    catchwtboxing and ideafix12 like this.
  10. MixedMartialLaw

    MixedMartialLaw Fight sports enthusiast Full Member

    1,583
    2,509
    Jun 30, 2021
    The Klitchko's were great individually but their era almost killed HW boxing. The new era even if not perfect, brought it back to some excitement.
     
  11. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    397,787
    79,890
    Nov 30, 2006
    Not what was asked.
     
    MaccaveliMacc likes this.
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    397,787
    79,890
    Nov 30, 2006
    Not what was asked.
     
    MaccaveliMacc likes this.
  13. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    397,787
    79,890
    Nov 30, 2006
    Not what was asked.
     
    MaccaveliMacc likes this.
  14. willcross

    willcross Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,367
    670
    Jun 11, 2006
    You’d pick Ibragimov to beat prime Fury? Everyone’s entitled to their opinion of course, I was just surprised to see that
     
    catchwtboxing likes this.
  15. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    34,729
    37,245
    Aug 28, 2012
    Didn't the Klitschko era include everyone from the post-Klitschko era, except they all ducked the Klitschkos and never fought each other?