In other words , does a Heavyweights high KO percentage mean someone was a harder puncher,or can style, accumulation and the opposition make the numbers deceptive? I'm pretty sure there's a few cases of this
Apart from Jimmy Ellis & Ken Norton, most of Earnie Shaver's top opponents got up and came back to stop him. The others on his list weren't exactly top class. Most of his reputation comes from glowing references from Ali, Holmes, Lyle, Cobb & Tillis. Funny quotes and all. I know people will say who better than those that got hit by him know better ? But notice one thing. These all beat him. Sure he hit hard. But the numbers on his record are deceptive.
Tucker had great KO %, but wasn't even close in terms of punching power to Tim Witherspon or, say, Gerrie Coetzee.
Exhibit A LaMar Clark 42 consecutive KOs which may still hold the record, not sure. 43 KOs in total. A record littered with debutants and none too impressive nor deep records otherwise. https://boxrec.com/en/box-pro/9367
Vitali Klitschko's record gives the impression that he was a Ukrainian hybrid of Tyson and Foreman. He was an absolute man of iron, but an all-time great puncher he was not.
Evander Holyfield 44wins 29 Kos. Doesn't sound frightening when compared to such as Mike Tyson or Wilder , but Holyfield could absolutely punch.
Razor Ruddock got a couple knockouts against shopworn versions of Dokes and Bonecrusher. He regressed as a boxer just looking for that one big punch. He did it at the expense of his jab which was pretty good at one time. Against top flight competition the Smash wasn't enough. Plus he telegraphed it. Razor could knockout a Greg Page with it not a Tyson or even Tommy Morrison.
VitKlit is the poster boy for this. Attrition puncher. with enormous KO percentage. Our new champ Hrgovic the same.
He has a lot of fanatics on here. Lewis was open for Klitscko's right hand all-night-long and Vitali still couldn't stop him.