Pacquioa - Marquez III or Pacquioa - Bradley? I still haven't watched the Pacquioa-Bradley again, so I just won't jump into conversations about "Pacquoa-Bradley robbery" and posting things like "Pacquioa was robbed".. I still have to consider the judges points on why they gave enough rounds for Bradley to win.. But for the record, I thought Pacquioa won.. :thumbsup Let me hear what ESB thinks.. :hi: :hi: :hi:
I want and feel i need to watch last nights fight again but ive gotta say at no point last night did i feel Pacman losing losing grip of the score cards where as i felt Marquez was guna get the nod in their last fight.
JMM v Pac was definitely closer. I felt JMM v Pac could have gone either way, Marquez certainly did the more eye catching work but Pac landed plenty himself. Bradley barely landed anything of note the entire fight. I'm still in shock at the decision to be honest.
JMM won clearly vs Pac 8 to 4, 9 to 3 type of deal Pac won by the same margin vs Bradley. Arum is a piece of ****.
Pac-Marquez for me (although I have it 7-5 for Marquez in their fight and 7-5 for Pac in the Bradley fight) In Pac-JMM III Marquez landed the cleaner, harder shots while Pac landed more punches in general. And personally it all boiled down to which criteria is more important (cleaner, harder shots for me) In Pac-Bradley Pac landed more shots and landed the cleaner and harder shots against Bradley so either way I'd have the fight for Pac. Bradley was active but tons of his shots were blocked.
For my personal scorecards, Pac-Bradley. Granted I've watched Pac-JMM a few times and the Pac-Bradley fight only live - but I had it 7-5 to 8-4