Which is better: Blood, urine or hair tests?

Marvelous Marvin Hagler always prefered the hair test. :!:

 

Hair is the best, with urine being equal to blood, but for practical reasons urine is best.

 

But both fighters are subject to the same test so how will Floyd provide a hair sample...?from what I understand it has to be a pretty long strand about a couple of inches

 

Noone says it has to be a hair from your head.

He could pull one from his hairy vagina.

 

The best way to get an impartial and accurate answer on any issue is to ask a *****. Whether it be legal issues, geography, forensic science or phlebotomy, the ***** provides light. In the interest of minimizing confusion, I believe this forum should be rebuilt into an "ask NALLEGE" format. We shall pitch our questions, and he shall teach.

 

Hair follicle testing can show that certain substances have been in the system at some point for as far as about a decade & about how recently they entered the system. They DON'T tell you that the substances are in the system right now.

Other body/fluid sample testing methods each have their own pros & cons. "Superior"/"inferior" is relative, based on what SPECIFIC PEDs/metabolites/hormones/hormonal markers/masking agents & processes/masking agent side effects/enzyme levels you wanna look for.

 

From what I read, hair testing is the best although it's a longer testing procedure. Mayweathers will never agree to it though because it is not intrusive enough to affect Manny mentally. They want Manny as mad as possible to throw his gameplan out.

Anyone who disagrees with what I said, go ahead, LIE TO EVERYONE ON CHRISTMAS! It's only your worthless soul you are staking.