Which is Mayweather better at?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Zone36, Dec 19, 2009.


  1. Zone36

    Zone36 Member Full Member

    164
    0
    Jun 17, 2009
    Boxing or getting people to hate him?

    Don't be so hasty on your choice.:think

    Think about it. Many people say it's a persona to get people talking about him.

    If it is, it's freakin genius.

    Of course you can see his work in the ring.

    But it's a little harder to quantify his work out of it.

    Although some may argue there's no special skill in acting like an ******* to others...

    And before you go whining that this isn't about boxing, it's the personalities that are keeping the sport alive. Take Sugar Shane. People say he's really quite good, but he doesn't get people talking much. Similar with Pac, but even though he's not much of a talker, most people can't argue that his rise to fame isn't an inspiring story.
     
  2. ed7890

    ed7890 Col. Hunter Gathers Full Member

    8,170
    0
    Apr 4, 2009
    He's good at talkin ****, he's great at boxing
     
  3. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    Should have did a public poll.

    No more comments :good
     
  4. koko of phil

    koko of phil Ring of Fire Resident Full Member

    2,246
    0
    Mar 20, 2005
    Floyd is better for both. But he needs to prove it in the ring.
     
  5. Zone36

    Zone36 Member Full Member

    164
    0
    Jun 17, 2009
    Well here is the big reason I ask. There have been interviews of guys who know him pretty well or are around him when he's just hangin around. They say he's a nice guy and quite good natured.

    But I don't recall ever seeing that in an interview or at least the media never has anything good to say about him except for his skill in the ring.
     
  6. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    0
    Sep 6, 2009
    pretty damn good at both
     
  7. koko of phil

    koko of phil Ring of Fire Resident Full Member

    2,246
    0
    Mar 20, 2005
    Because the media hardly can't find any good of him off the ring. Those guys who can handle Floyd around are probably just suckers or same punk as he is.
     
  8. MATUBSKI82

    MATUBSKI82 Active Member Full Member

    548
    0
    Jun 26, 2009
  9. RKO

    RKO Member Full Member

    276
    0
    Oct 11, 2008
    you should have added another poll option: All of the Above
     
  10. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    Floyd is an interesting character, because when he wants to be he can sound intelligent and sincere and be a likeable guy. Then he goes on tangents acting like a thug and throwing money around and flaunting his wealth, which only really impresses non intelligent people.
    I guess he feels like hes got the boxing world locked up with his skills so by acting like a thug he can attract a whole different crowd which he seems to like to socialize and hang out with.
     
  11. Zone36

    Zone36 Member Full Member

    164
    0
    Jun 17, 2009

    I was against that because I wanted people to think critically and not have some lazy cop out.
     
  12. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    Great boxer, great **** talker, but best of all:

    Great avoider of natural Welterweights.
     
  13. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Floyd is a dork. Lame talker. Great fighter.
     
  14. Jolly Roger

    Jolly Roger Active Member Full Member

    1,112
    1,119
    Nov 5, 2007
    I think his trash talking is weak. Fans hate him because he doesn't fight the people they want him to. I think fans look past a guys personality if they see them doing what they want in the ring.