Which is the Biggest Robbery in the Last Decade

Sturm-De La Hoya, Holyfield-Valuev, Lewis-Holyfield 1 (well, it's another decade), Santa Cruz-Casamayor, all bigger than your suggestions IMO.

 

Every of last Valuev fight.

 

Sturm v ODLH should be right up there

 

It has a top10 list. I think DLH-Sturm wins it.

 

Holyfield-Lewis I was more than a decade ago at this point. To call some of those fights named in the article robberies is ridiculous though. Close fights, sure. Controversial fights, sure. But half the fights named in that article were far from being robberies.

Anyway, my vote would go to Sturm-DLH. The fact that the author had Mosley-DLH higher than Sturm-DLH highlights that the author has no idea what a robbery is.

 

My thoughts exactly:
1) Close does not equal robbery.
2) Sturm fight too low.

Poor article.

 

What?

Lewis/Holyfield by a long shot.

I damn near shitted on myself when the results were read. Plus - I had money on that fight and walked away with nothing because of it. Still makes me mad when I think about it.

De la Hoya/Strum was pretty bad. All of that - just for him to crawl on the floor from a B-Hop Body shot. That's what you call "For the Love of Money!"

 

Calzaghe-Hopkins was very bad, that should have been a very wide UD to Calzaghe.

 

Out of those 4 fight's I'd have to say the Lewis fight is the least imortant (legacy wise)

Those 2 De La Hoya fight's & the JLC fight were defo fight's that would have changed boxing history had it gone the other way, alot of big fight's made or not made cause of the results of those outcomes.

 

That is a terrible list. Mayweather vs. Castillo was far from a "robbery". And what about Ruiz vs. Holyfield 1 back in 2000? One of the worst decisions I have ever seen.

 

Sturm DLH.

 

I agree with PBF...close fight FARRRR from a robbery???? figueroa over augustus was the biggest I have seen lately