Which is the more reasonable score for Floyd vs Canelo

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by joeyp130, May 31, 2017.


Which score is more reasonable for Floyd vs Canelo:

Poll closed Jun 7, 2017.
  1. 8-4 Floyd

    90.5%
  2. 6-6 Draw

    9.5%
  1. joeyp130

    joeyp130 Active Member Full Member

    927
    247
    Dec 15, 2013
    Which score is more reasonable:
     
  2. rodney

    rodney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,331
    634
    Jun 16, 2006
    Floyd won 12 - 0. Cavelike couldn't hit him in the ass with a broomstick.
     
    KnightAndDay, Booker18 and aaalbert like this.
  3. Gil Gonzalez

    Gil Gonzalez Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,607
    2,860
    Jun 15, 2012
    I generously gave Canelo 2 rounds. That's the maximum I think.
     
  4. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,140
    9,872
    Aug 1, 2012
    Cool story bro .
     
  5. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,164
    240,580
    Nov 23, 2013
    118-110 or 117-111 are the best scores.

    119-109 is also acceptable. If you stretch logic to its absolute breaking point, maybe 116-112.
     
  6. joeyp130

    joeyp130 Active Member Full Member

    927
    247
    Dec 15, 2013
    I am just wondering the general consensus is..which is more reasonable. If I remember right, scoring it live I believe I scored it 9-3
     
  7. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,164
    240,580
    Nov 23, 2013
    Both are very reasonable, I scored it 117-111 or 9-3 as well.
     
    heerko koois likes this.
  8. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,140
    9,872
    Aug 1, 2012
    119-109 is unacceptable. 120-108 is sheer madness. Anyone who seriously thinks that Floyd won every single round has got to be out their freakin mind. The majority of the rounds were very even and you really had to split hairs to decide a winner. This was not an easy fight to score. 117-111 is really stretching it.
     
  9. Kush

    Kush Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,095
    980
    Dec 16, 2007
    118-110

    Good lesson for young Canelo
     
    yesihavearm2 and CST80 like this.
  10. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,164
    240,580
    Nov 23, 2013
    Don't come at me with the 119-109 crying, that was @IntentionalButt and @PinoyProdigy's scorecards IIRC, so take it up with them.:deal: Although I can see where they're coming from, a match can be very competitive from start to finish, but its totally conceivable that one guy can win every round 51/49.
     
  11. joeyp130

    joeyp130 Active Member Full Member

    927
    247
    Dec 15, 2013
    6-6 is just as unacceptable. Floyd landed over 100 punches more and doubled Canelos connect %. How many rounds did canelo outland Floyd?

    6-6 is either inept judging, or a bought judge.

    The fight was NOT close. No one believes that except you.
     
    KiwiMan, Booker18 and CST80 like this.
  12. khaosai galaxi

    khaosai galaxi Superbad Full Member

    2,979
    2,510
    Apr 17, 2017
    Floyd 9-3 or 8-4 if you are a Mexican lol
     
  13. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,140
    9,872
    Aug 1, 2012
    I'm not crying about 119-109. That wasn't one of the judges scores. The judges scores were 114-114, 116-112, and 117-111. I found those scores acceptable. 115-113 or 116-112 make the most sense to me. 114-114 or 117-111 is stretching it, but still acceptable. 118-110 or 115-113 Canelo, that's really stretching it. 119-109 or 116-112 Canelo would be unacceptable. Floyd won a handful of rounds decisively. Canelo maybe won 1 or 2 rounds decisively. The rest of the rounds were extremely even, where it pretty much comes down to subjectively who you preferred. To just give all the close rounds to Floyd or say he won every round is unacceptable. That's lazy, incredibly biased scoring.

    I accept your score of 117-111 about as much as I accept 114-114. Those are OK with me, anything further than that just doesn't seem reasonable. I do not object to Floyd winning the fight, what I object to is those hugely exaggerating the margin of Floyd's win. There is nothing wrong with my accepting of the official judges. That's my stance and if someone wants to argue that the official scores are wrong or too close the burden is on them to explain it.
     
  14. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,140
    9,872
    Aug 1, 2012
    You have to score the fight round by round. Moretti and Ross scored 10 of the 12 rounds identically. Two rounds Ross gave to Canelo that Moretti gave to Floyd. That's the differece between a generally accepted score and a not acceptable score. If you want to evaluate how inept it is, then you have to go back and rewatch those two rounds and decide how close those rounds were. I am not the only one to state that the fight was competitive. I'm not endorsing CJ Ross's card, I'm just not objecting to it like the majority has. It shouldn't have caused any outrage. I know what I saw, and I saw a close fight, a fight that I fully expected Floyd to win for obvious reasons, but a close fight nonetheless. I mean Floyd hadn't had a close fight in years up until that point. So we were so conditioned to Floyd winning nearly every round fans went into the fight expecting that to happen vs Canelo. Only that didn't happen, so the public imagined Floyd winning rounds when he really wasn't. The rounds actually were so close that it depended on who's work you preferred.
     
  15. bcr

    bcr Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,563
    1,440
    Dec 21, 2013
    My goodness.
     
    Flamazide likes this.