Which judge gave the right verdict on Pascal-Hopkins??

Well, this was my thread about the judges(prior to the fight), you can go and see the critics and whatever you want here.
http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?p=8473514

After the fight, this were the judges scorecards for the fight:
http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=276881

Now my question, which of the judges scored the bout the best.

 

i myself had it a draw, so have to choose the paquette/van de weile one

 

That's what I want, I'm not asking if it was 113-113 or 114-114 so you picked the right one.:good

 

Hopkins 116-111

Completely controlled everything, and at times he was clowning Pascal, making him look foolish.

By the way, kingalex, what is your brief (or detailed, I guess) opinion of the Pascal/Dawson match?

 

115-111

Hopkins won rds 4-12

 

How can you have a poll with no question? Doesn't make sense, what are you asking?

 

the knockdowns got Pascal the draw

 

The question was inside, but thanks. Hopefully this brings a lot of posters here.:good

 

114-112, and just about everywhere I look that is the score that people give.

 

I saw the same I saw in this one, but Pascal's opponent had no sense of urgency or I don't know what, Pascal stamina lasted 6 rounds again but B-HOP took care of business and Dawson didn't. I'm not taking away credit to Pascal, but Dawson should have done better if he threw more punches when Pascal was on the ropes, but for some reason he decided to simply look at him without throwing, my score was 106-103 for Pascal at that time but I'm picking Dawson to win a rematch, that's what I saw.