Which Light Heavy looked the best tonight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by andyZOR, Apr 12, 2008.


  1. andyZOR

    andyZOR Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,049
    2
    Feb 28, 2007
    Tarver, Johnson, Dawson and Woods


    My vote goes to Johnson. I scored the fight for Dawson, but Johnson impressed me being this old guy showed and gave it his all in a great fight. I didn't expect that.

    Worst fighter tonight:

    Woods.

    I couldn't belive how horrid Woods was.
     
  2. deal

    deal Member Full Member

    144
    0
    Mar 4, 2006
    I voted Johnson instead of Tarver because my gran would have looked good against Woods tonight.
     
  3. andyZOR

    andyZOR Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,049
    2
    Feb 28, 2007
  4. Welsh Dragon

    Welsh Dragon Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,650
    1
    Dec 23, 2007
    :good
     
  5. compukiller

    compukiller Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,428
    6
    Mar 4, 2006
    Johnson, by far. I expected more out of Dawson, but he lost clearly on my scorecard.
     
  6. sugarngold

    sugarngold RIDDUM Full Member

    18,550
    5
    Jun 10, 2007
    Glen Johnson looked the best in hurting Dawson several times in their fight.
     
  7. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,461
    1,723
    Nov 20, 2007
    Glen Johnson. He fought a P4P skilled fighter in Dawson and pulled it off on my cards. What a performance! Tarver did a great job as well but he wasn't the underdog at all. The way he was dominated was the surprise but all props should go to Mr. Johnson, one of the true good guys in boxing.

    Wow, 2008 IS the year of the oldies...
     
  8. mattress

    mattress Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,030
    2
    Apr 8, 2007
    Woods was bloody awful. He made Tarver look better than he is.
     
  9. Larson

    Larson Paenkhay Full Member

    2,747
    0
    Dec 7, 2007
  10. the_what

    the_what Bolo Punch KO Full Member

    8,031
    0
    Jul 20, 2004
    I voted Woods when I meant Johnson.