Which lopsided UD12 was more embarassing: Haye or Hamed?

Haye didn't really get smacked around as Naz did, but he also ran and flopped like mad. :think

Considering that Haye was supposed to lose anyway (to any even halfway intelligent mong, anyhow), I'll say his loss was a bit less embarrassing.

 

neither because they retired as multi millionaires

 

Haye for me. Hamed tried, he tried his way and was easily outboxed. Haye never really tried until the 11th, after all the smack talk he never put his neck on the line to knock the man out which was clearly what he was guna have to do.

 

I thought Hamed won

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZkF9E4hr0I[/ame]

 

MAB-Hamed being lopsided is one of the biggest myths in boxing. MAB won clearly but he didn't dominate and shut out The Prince. Wlad shut Haye out and he wasn't competitive. Haye was really humbled for the amount of **** he talked.

 

Hamed actually tried.

Haye did not.

 

Hmm... Probably Naz.

As IB stated, Haye's defeat wasn't really a surprise (he himself knew he'd most likely lose), but Hamed's simply shattered his ego and his career.

 

This.

When people talk about cockiness. Hamed was always cocky/arrogant...he didn't need that to talk himself in to a bout, that's the way he was. It was always going to be humbling once he got that first defeat. But Haye talked that much crap for a number of years looking for that one bout with either brother. His humbling was always going to be worse.

 

Haye for me without doubt.

Say what you will about Hamed but he took the defeat on the chin afterwards and didn't use any ludicrous excuses.

MAB was superb that night and i'm not discrediting him but Hamed was on the slide as opposed to Haye who was at his optimum.

Hamed was still trying to win, while Haye was looking to survive.

Hamed>Haye all day long.

 

I'm a self-confessed Barrera fanboy but I do admit the poetic justice he administered to Hamed wasn't as one-sided as some like to remember.
But it was marvellous.
I don't think they're that far apart as Haye had no answers at all for Wlad.
But Hamed does enough(or not) to take this one.

 

Obviously Hamed

Though neither fights were as one sided as most idiots try so hard to make out

 

While there should be no shame in losing to Wladimir Klitschko or Marco Antonio Barrera in your respective division to me this comes down to who actually put forth an effort.

Naz tried unsuccessfully but he was simply outclassed by an elite fighter with a coherent game plan.

Haye on the other hand was afraid to take chances and seemed to be happy to last the distance; it was as though not getting embarrassed and possibly getting in a lucky shot was part of his game plan.

I did a thread a while back asking if "Did Haye have the talent to beat Klitschko but simply lack the courage?" The way I see it both fighters had the answer but Prince Naseem at least gave it a college try.

Shouldn't take away from Wlad's win though, Haye simply bitched out because he was afraid to get stopped.

 

Hamed fight wasn't lopsided. Yes he lost but it wasn't lopsided

 

And ive never cringed as much after the fight as i did when the toe excuses came out, i was up for Haye but at that moment i just wished hed kept it to himself. That alone makes it worse for me.