Which loser experienced more of a robbery than a loss: Macklin or Mathysse?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JabCross727, Jun 26, 2011.


  1. Post Box

    Post Box I'm back too, bitches Full Member

    14,484
    3
    Oct 12, 2010
    I don't understand how anyone can make a case for Alexander winning but from some one rooting for Macklin I can still see how people could have Sturm ahead
     
  2. madkillaz692000

    madkillaz692000 Fuerte y Abundante Full Member

    3,492
    0
    May 3, 2009
    Voted for Macklin. He should have taken the belt back home.
     
  3. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,098
    Jul 19, 2004
    Matthysse was cheated badly, but I knew it before the fight. Alexander had his judges to protect him, just like he did with Kotelnik!
     
  4. MetalLicker

    MetalLicker I Am Full Member

    26,078
    31,293
    Feb 10, 2011
    Saw both fights. Macklin wasn't that effective throughout the fight. I gave him the first 5 rounds based on activity, but it got really hard to find rounds for him after that. It was a close fight, a fight he would have won in Britain or a draw/SD elsewhere.

    Alexander/Matthysse was a joke. Matthysse won the fight clearly and he was robbed. They gave every advantage to Alexander, even the judges. 10 rounds for a title eliminator? WTF is that? And then giving rounds to Alexander that he clearly lost. Shameful.